We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
in a pickle - assured shorthold tenancy
Comments
-
Useful post CIS,as ever, but note that after expiry of the Fixed Term the tenancy doesn't "revert", ie go back, to a stat periodic, it moves on to oneThis situation comes up quite regularly with the L/Lords we deal with. If the period falls within a tenancy agreement then we would have no choice but to hold the tenants liable for as long as the agreements lasts / until another person moves in (if earlier).
Where the tenancy reverted to an ongoing one after the initial agreement ended then we would only hold a person to the end of the notice period , any further and the landlord would have to provide proof of that the tenancy period has rolled on to cover that period.0 -
Thanks CIS so the landlord in my case has to somehow prove we stayed there really even though i contacted all bill companies, the council tax office also have notice of me leaving and the multiple messages to the landlord.
Not going to let me or my partner get stung by them. It took us 8 months to get them to even send us a copy of the agreement thats how slack they are.Appreciate everyone’s advice here, keep up the great work!0 -
So. Four joint tenants.On the original tenancy was 4 people, me and 1 my partner left together, one was kicked out and one remained with a new tenant after we left the new tenant never signed anything.
The tenant who got kicked out had the deposit so we never had one with them.
The fixed term ended on January 28th 2011, all bills in my name where closed when i moved and settled.
Three move out but one remains in occupation.
The tenancy has not ended since one of the joint tenants is still there.
Therefore all 4 original joint tenants remain equally liable for rent (and council tax etc).
Assuming the tenancy agreement was "joint and several" liability.
How was number 3 'kicked out'? By the landlord? (illegal eviction?) Or by the other tenants.....?0 -
The other two left at the end of the month just to clarify, we left the weekend before the end of the month so everyone was out before the end of the month
Appreciate everyone’s advice here, keep up the great work!0 -
1) how many people are named on the original tenancy agreement? Who are these other 'two guys'? OK - Joint tenantsThe other two left at the end of the month just to clarify, we left the weekend before the end of the month so everyone was out before the end of the month
2) What (precise) date did the original Fixed Term end? What date did you send your Notice? What date did you move out?
3) Were keys returned? Accepted by landlord/agent? Had you paid a deposit and was it returned? This all indicates wherher or not the tenancy ended, when and how.
4) what happened to other utility bills? Did you close gas/electric accounts and pay final bills? OK - accounts closed
5) Did new tenants move in so far as you know? When?0 -
Therefore all 4 original joint tenants remain equally liable for rent (and council tax etc).
Not necessarily. Council tax liability does not equate to rental liability. Each council will have a schedule of liability which is a ranking of who should be paying. Typically what matters is residence.
In theory you could have a tenant who is not resident I suppose, though it would be rare. Such a tenant could conceivably even benefit from things like empty-home discounts, if they applied correctly.
Mind you, that's a pedantic point. But thought I'd mention it.0 -
So. Four joint tenants.
Therefore all 4 original joint tenants remain equally liable for rent (and council tax etc).
Assuming the tenancy agreement was "joint and several" liability.
Afraid not, if one member of a joint contract gives the correct notice it brings that contract to an end. Its not just me saying this, this is Shelters advise on the subject.
In addition the council tax would have become the sole responsibility of the remaining tenant, as a sole occupant he/she could have claimed the 25% discount. As soon as another tenant moved in the full council tax would have been the responsibility of both tenants.0 -
You are correct that in a Periodic Tenancy, any one of the 4 can give valid notice to end the tenancy and it is legally as if all 4 had given notice. The Notice is therefore valid and must be accepted by the LL as such.Afraid not, if one member of a joint contract gives the correct notice it brings that contract to an end. Its not just me saying this, this is Shelters advise on the subject.
In addition the council tax would have become the sole responsibility of the remaining tenant, as a sole occupant he/she could have claimed the 25% discount. As soon as another tenant moved in the full council tax would have been the responsibility of both tenants.
However, that is not the same as ending a tenancy.
If at the end of the notice period one or more joint tenant does not move out, then clearly the tenancy has not ended.
In that scenario, all 4 remain jointly and severally liable.0 -
You are correct that in a Periodic Tenancy, any one of the 4 can give valid notice to end the tenancy and it is legally as if all 4 had given notice. The Notice is therefore valid and must be accepted by the LL as such.
However, that is not the same as ending a tenancy.
If at the end of the notice period one or more joint tenant does not move out, then clearly the tenancy has not ended.
In that scenario, all 4 remain jointly and severally liable.
Are you sure that's correct, G_M?
I was in a similar situation, and was advised by Shelter that one tenant in a joint and several (periodic) agreement giving correct notice to end the tenancy, ends the tenancy for all parties once the notice expires. I was told by Shelter that as long as I gave the notice correctly, my liability as a tenant ended once that notice expired, regardless of what my (awful) flatmate did. Of course, the LL could still make deductions from our joint deposit, but it was my understanding that once the (correctly served) notice expired, the tenancy no longer existed.
Yellowstar x0 -
Interesting discussion on this one at
http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2011/04/11/tenants-legal-help-five-things-about-joint-tenants/
See Tessa's point 5 and then the comments from others below0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards