We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
To those of you with GPS speedos
Comments
-
This article on GPS speed measurement is quite interesting: http://www.aprs.net/vm/gps_cs.htm
It was written while Selective Availability (SA) was still in use, which made the signal only accurate to around 100m for civilian use. It suggests that without SA, the reported speed is normally accurate to within 0.07mph (and accurate to within 1mph with SA).Let's settle this like gentlemen: armed with heavy sticks
On a rotating plate, with spikes like Flash Gordon
And you're Peter Duncan; I gave you fair warning0 -
I found that on my Mondeo - the car knew the real speed, but the speedo was deliberately reporting a little faster.Strider590 wrote: »Speedo dial = 78(ish)
OBDII reading directly from the cars ECU = 71
GPS = 70
Conclusive proof that the dial has been calibrated to show a higher than actual reading, whilst the car's ECU knows it's exact speed to be much lower.
On my current landcruiser, speedo says 60, real speed is 56.0 -
2010 Mondeo:
Speedo 70mph = sat nav 67mph
I tend to drive to the sat nav reading TBH, especially in motorway roadwork 50 limits. Where I get to 50mph on the sat nav then hit cruise control.
0 -
-
2010 Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi
Speedo 75 - GPS 70.
GPS device is an Origin B2 with the external antenna stuck in the back window.0 -
-
pinkteapot wrote: »Because it's illegal for a speedo to under-read, so they err on the side of caution and make them over-read...
IIRC the over read has to be within 10%0 -
It measures flat distance, unfortunately roads have hills and dips, so sat navs are often a bit low.
Does it really? I thought it measures 3d vector speed by taking bearings from 3 or more satellites simultaneously, also some fitted ones use dead reckoning from engine pulses or other fitted input from the vehicle, but I am willing to be proved wrong do you have any up to date links etc.?
http://www.satnavforensics.com/how-sat-nav-works.phpThe truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0 -
My sat is about 2 to 3 miles behind the Speedo
Ford kaI owe £3233 @ 0%0 -
The_ICT_Engineer wrote: »Actual I own Dutton Commander, Which I can just drive into the thames.
Apart from showing off, what useful information have you contributed so far to the ops question?
None.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


