We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Austerity Disaster

2456711

Comments

  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Anybody with a degree of financial sense would know that that this isn't achievable.

    I agree.....

    Which just goes to show how clueless TPTB really are.
    “Those who argue that dealing with our deficit and promoting growth are somehow alternatives are wrong. You cannot put off the first in order to promote the second.”
    -- David Cameron

    “I firmly believe, that in the current circumstances confidence-inspiring policies will foster and not hamper economic recovery, because confidence is the key factor today.”
    --Jean-Claude Trichet
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    Half a century ago, any economist — or for that matter any undergraduate who had read Paul Samuelson’s textbook “Economics” — could have told you that austerity in the face of depression was a very bad idea. (from Hamish's article)

    Half a century ago, Samuelson's textbook followed a largely Keynesian approach to economics. I think both Samuelson and Keynes would have been flummoxed by the concept of managing to build up such huge deficits during such a long run of prosperity.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,227 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    And yet the result of an unsustainable public debt trajectory are staring us in the face every day and yet still many are suggesting we can spend our way out of the problem...take the blinkers off guys. The risk that we will lose the confidence of the markets and face IMF imposed crash diet austerity remains very real. The markets may be 'wrong' when they push up interest rates perceiving a higher risk of default but for a country that spends more than it earns there is no other game in town.
    I think....
  • everyone wants to blame bankers, but the real issue for Europe is its socialist lefty agenda. massive benefits for the bone idle, huge public sectors, massive pensions. it is completely unsustainable. however, the lefty will never back down. look at the union scum holding London to ransom yet again over bribes for working during the olympics. why do they do it, because they get what they want every time.

    until the lefties realise their dreams are unworkable, there is no hope.
  • Mr_Mumble
    Mr_Mumble Posts: 1,758 Forumite
    Just goes to show I have no blind allegiance to ideology, but can consider a good idea from wherever it comes from in the political or economic spectrum.
    It isn't an ideological question but a factual one. As Warner points out Krugman doesn't even realise the "Great Depression" was not that in the UK - if you want to look at austerity look at 1920 or the late 1940s.
    Hmmmm, Nobel prize winning economist or Moneyweek journalist?
    An economics professor whose ideas are featured in Moneyweek - not the journalist. Also, it's kinda ridiculous trying to pull an argumentum ad verecundiam with Krugman the Enron adviser.
    vivatifosi wrote: »
    Half a century ago, any economist — or for that matter any undergraduate who had read Paul Samuelson’s textbook “Economics” — could have told you that austerity in the face of depression was a very bad idea. (from Hamish's article)

    Half a century ago, Samuelson's textbook followed a largely Keynesian approach to economics. I think both Samuelson and Keynes would have been flummoxed by the concept of managing to build up such huge deficits during such a long run of prosperity.
    To get an idea of just how wrong Samuelson - and Keynesian thinking in general - is on austerity read this (for Hamish: that is also written by someone who has a PhD in Economics and is not a Moneyweek journalist!).
    "The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastiat, 1848.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,499 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    All this austerity is very bad for the economy - the Chinese economy, I mean. It's also bad for employment - Chinese employment. Well, you get the picture.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    Mr_Mumble wrote: »
    To get an idea of just how wrong Samuelson - and Keynesian thinking in general - is on austerity read this (for Hamish: that is also written by someone who has a PhD in Economics and is not a Moneyweek journalist!).

    To be fair Keynesianism has its place, but it is context specific and this isn't the right context. A bit like prescribing polio medicine for leprosy then wondering why your leg needs to be cut off.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • IronWolf
    IronWolf Posts: 6,445 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why is everything always the governments fault? Have people not realised yet that there are some things the government cant do anything about, and a global depression is one of them.
    Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.
  • everyone wants to blame bankers, but the real issue for Europe is its socialist lefty agenda. massive benefits for the bone idle, huge public sectors, massive pensions. it is completely unsustainable. however, the lefty will never back down. look at the union scum holding London to ransom yet again over bribes for working during the olympics. why do they do it, because they get what they want every time.

    until the lefties realise their dreams are unworkable, there is no hope.


    Wow!!

    Pretty brutal stuff, and I am a big critic of the way the welfare state has gone. But I am also aware that there are people at the bottom of the food chain that need some tough love not unforgiving hate.

    I do blame the financial centre/ Bankers in the UK today, for some reason ALL of our political parties have bent over backwards to give them whatever they want, they are still doing it now while the poor suffer.

    I partly agree with Hamish, but what I would support is a huge infastructure project to bring the UK up and beyond the 21st century, the people in the UK that you now so loathe could maybe find their pride again with a spade in hand.

    Let finance bog off to the far east or wherever it wants to go, we need real hope and real jobs for real people.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hmm. Austerity, UK style. Nominal UK Government spending (incl. local and devolved Governments):

    2007: £544,000,000,000
    2008: £575,700,000,000
    2009: £621,500,000,000
    2010: £660,600,000,000
    2011: £683,400,000,000*
    2012: £703,400,000,000*
    2013: £722,200,000,000*

    *Estimated.

    Dr K also ignores (rather usefully given his argument) the fact that the UK had 10 years of recession or below par growth from 1921 - 31 due enforced deflation to enable a return to and continuance of the Gold Standard at pre-WW1 gold prices. The subsequent depression and return to growth has to be seen in that historical context.

    Also while it is reasonable to argue that a set of policies made the 1930s Great Depression worse, it doesn't follow that following a specifically different set of policies in the 2010s Great Recession will produce a better outcome. To stretch vivatifosi's metaphor somewhat it's rather like arguing that because the polio medicine didn't work for the last leper, Lemsip is certain to work for the next one.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.