We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
McAfee renewal - Dell
Comments
-
In what way is it bad?0
-
:idea:0
-
Test results mean nothing to me nowadays - especially those ones - I certainly wouldn't discount it based on the results from that site.
http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/matousec-personal-firewall-tests-analyzed.htm
At the end of the day it does what a firewall is supposed to do - as do many that score lowly in those tests.0 -
You asked and thats my reply. I can state by a matter of fact that Nortons firewall is full of holes:idea:0
-
Explain more - What /where are these holes?
Don't matousec's results fly in the face of the av-comparatives Whole Product tests - Test's that they came out on top of in 2010 and look set to do again in 2011?Personally I only use av-comparitives
They test just about everything that can be tested0 -
Explain more - What /where are these holes?
Don't matousec's results fly in the face of the av-comparatives Whole Product tests - Test's that they came out on top of in 2010 and look set to do again in 2011?
I dont see why I 'need' to explain anything. But if you can show me some actual 'firewall' tests that av comparitives have done Ill take it from there (If I can be bothered):idea:0 -
To me, a firewall (from a home users point of view) is basically there to allow (solicited) or deny (unsolicited) traffic between the computer and the internet - I really can't see how Norton doesn't acheive this.
Anything beyond that isn't specifically the job of a firewall - The matousec tests you cited go beyond testing that into the realms of HIPs etc. As stated in the link I gave it can no longer be regarded solely as a firewall test, so to draw conclusions that a products firewall must be "bad" based on those tests would be wrong.0 -
As you wish waddler. I still say its full of holes and there are FAR better firewalls available. Can we move on now?:idea:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards