We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Work Programme

Hello members,

Can someone kindly tell me how someone would have to remain off of DWP benefits to not have to return to the Work Programme?

If for example, someone signed off for say 3 months and then started a new claim, would they then be forced to re-join the work programme?

Cheers
«1

Comments

  • nannytone_2
    nannytone_2 Posts: 13,004 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    yes, you would be straight back on the work programme.
  • would being signed onto the work programme interfere with your cash in hand job then? Hence being able to sign off for 3 months lol
    "If you don't feel the bumps in the road, you're not really going anywhere "
  • jojo_2012 wrote: »
    would being signed onto the work programme interfere with your cash in hand job then? Hence being able to sign off for 3 months lol

    There is always one! If you have nothing constructive to say, then say nothing.....
  • busy_mom_2
    busy_mom_2 Posts: 1,391 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why do you not want to go on the work programme would be my first question, second would be IF there is a sign off period of 3 mnths, how will you manage financially ?
  • cpatte7372 wrote: »
    Hello members,

    Can someone kindly tell me how someone would have to remain off of DWP benefits to not have to return to the Work Programme?

    If for example, someone signed off for say 3 months and then started a new claim, would they then be forced to re-join the work programme?

    Cheers
    You would be returned to the Work Programme, but I wouldn't worry about it. All that is required is to attend a meeting with them every two or three weeks for around 30mins and then they send you on your merry way!
  • Thanks got some good feed back - going ignore the negative comments .....
  • Tehya
    Tehya Posts: 501 Forumite
    Maybe he/she has a temp three month work contract?
  • cpatte7372 wrote: »
    There is always one! If you have nothing constructive to say, then say nothing.....

    lol nope nope and nope
    "If you don't feel the bumps in the road, you're not really going anywhere "
  • Parva
    Parva Posts: 1,104 Forumite
    cpatte7372 wrote: »
    Hello members,

    Can someone kindly tell me how someone would have to remain off of DWP benefits to not have to return to the Work Programme?

    If for example, someone signed off for say 3 months and then started a new claim, would they then be forced to re-join the work programme?

    Cheers
    Once you get to the Work Programme stage it lasts for 2 years. So you could attend your first appointment or get a job or whatever and sign off. I'm afraid that signing back on within that two year period puts you straight back onto the Work Programme. Now I don't know if going back resets the 'clock' though I would imagine that it does. :(
  • cit_k
    cit_k Posts: 24,812 Forumite
    Parva wrote: »
    Once you get to the Work Programme stage it lasts for 2 years. So you could attend your first appointment or get a job or whatever and sign off. I'm afraid that signing back on within that two year period puts you straight back onto the Work Programme. Now I don't know if going back resets the 'clock' though I would imagine that it does. :(

    So you could get on the work program, get a job, work for nearly 2 years, then the company goes under, sign on JSA and be straight back into the work program?

    If thats a case, the claim the work program is targetted at the long term unemployed without any work experience is a fantasy.
    [greenhighlight]but it matters when the most senior politician in the land is happy to use language and examples that are simply not true.
    [/greenhighlight][redtitle]
    The impact of this is to stigmatise people on benefits,
    and we should be deeply worried about that
    [/redtitle](house of lords debate, talking about Cameron)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.