We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
running car on water vapour instead of petrol
Comments
-
It's not quite as far fetched as you make out

Obviously, you can't "burn" water vapour but during WW2 there were a number of aircraft fitted with water injection (might still be used today).
Water was sprayed onto (into?) the fuel as it entered the combustion chamber. The cooling effect allowed higher super/turbo charger boosts for more power during "emergency" situations without destroying the engine. Some had a water/methonol system to further increase power.
What happens with water injection is that the volume of water injected increases by 1600% on turning to steam which has a supercharging effect at the expense of clean burn . Effective for a short boost.You scullion! You rampallian! You fustilarian! I’ll tickle your catastrophe (Henry IV part 2)0 -
anotherbaldrick wrote: »What happens with water injection is that the volume of water injected increases by 1600% on turning to steam which has a supercharging effect at the expense of clean burn . Effective for a short boost.
You may well be right but the primary use of water is to cool the fuel/air mixture & combustion chamber to prevent detonation allowing higher compression/ignition timings & boost pressures.
That's how I remember it anyway.Always try to be at least half the person your dog thinks you are!0 -
I'm actually surprised a small, sunny, self-governing island community (one of the smaller Caribbean islands, for example) hasn't taken a punt on switching over to a hydrogen economy. With relatively few homes and cars to run, the start-up cost would be much smaller than for a country like the UK and it would be useful proof that a hydrogen economy could work.
It's not really that surprising. Although a small island state may not feel it as badly as somewhere that needs to cart fuel around a bit more, hydrogen is a horrifically poor method of energy storage, so it largely doesn't make sense.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards