We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
dodgy tenants
Comments
-
Sounds like the tenants don't understand that they are responsible for the rent as a whole; whether HB pays some, all or none, they are ultimately responsible for the rent in total.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
-
I would serve Section 21 Notice to expire at end of the fixed term (Must end of last day of fixed term and two months notice to be given).
If they owe more than two months rent, I would also serve Section 8 Notice relying on grounds 8, 10, 11 and 12 (two weeks notice required).
It doesn't matter who pays what rent or when, your tenants remain liable. Again, it doesnt matter if your tenants are in prison, you still need a Court order for possession or it is unlawful eviction and they could claim compensation from you.
I would get the notices served and the process started.0 -
To be brutally honest the top up problem is so common as to be the norm, dss is normally only about £50 - £60 per week for everything , now deduct the top up of ...£5/£6/£15 per week........1
If the tenant has a wee private job this may not be a problem (of course the council may then stop his whole hb claim) but if he has a disability and can't work or two kids to look after etc etc.
The other tenant has probably bolted, check the flat out and see for yourself, call him on someone elses mobile to confirm he has gone and relet the place. I wouldn't spend much time worrying about lawsuits.
As for the rent, its a business cost, its gone forget about it and move on.0 -
We had a tenant who absconded but left her other halfs property in the house. We had to put a letter through the door to notify her that if she did not contact us within 24 hours due to the apparent abandonment of the property we would have to gain access to the property.
I can't remember where we got the letter from but I know I spent hours trawling the internet looking to see what we had to do.
We then changed the locks but had to put notices around the property notifying anyone who needed to gain access to the property that they could do so by contacting us at our address and also gave a phone number. We also had to notify the police.0 -
Second one. The council will not pay Housing Benefit if the claimant is not living at the property. I would take it that they have quit the property and suggest you make an effort to contact them to confirm this. If contact cannot be made, maybe you could smell gas as you walk past the property. This would allow you to legally force entry. When the source of the smell has been identified (and rectified by switching the cooker fully off) you could assess whether the tenant has indeed quit. Change the locks and re-let.
Do this and you will meet your tenant...In Prison0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote:If contact cannot be made, maybe you could smell gas as you walk past the property. This would allow you to legally force entry. When the source of the smell has been identified
No need to do this - just put a letter through the letterbox telling them that you require access to the property to inspect it at a certain time. Provided you give them 24 Hours notice you are doing nothing wrong.
As for gaining access - why force entry. Go round there at the time given in your letter and knock on the door. If there is no answer let yourself in - you can then assess whether they are still living there.0 -
""If there is no answer let yourself in - you can then assess whether they are still living there.""
whilst you might like to do this - it is not legal under any circumstances to let yourself into the property - except for extreme emergency - such as a genuine gas leak or a flood etc.
Can't you see thru the windows what is happening ?0 -
realwildone wrote:
Quote:
The council will not pay Housing Benefit if the claimant is not living at the property. I would take it that they have quit the property and suggest you make an effort to contact them to confirm this. If contact cannot be made, maybe you could smell gas as you walk past the property. This would allow you to legally force entry. When the source of the smell has been identified (and rectified by switching the cooker fully off) you could assess whether the tenant has indeed quit. Change the locks and re-let.
Do this and you will meet your tenant...In Prison
I think the awol tenant has to take me to court - yet he owes me top up rent of £150..... As the housing benefit part of the rent has been stopped and there's no income at all from this property, am I supposed to wait another 4 months until the end of the tenancy agreement to serve an 8 & 21, then another 2 months to take it to court? Who pays the council tax during this period, not to mention the rent?? Commonsense tells me that I'm not some nasty criminal, just a guy who has bills of his own to pay, can't see me ending up in prison for that whether or not it's against the law. The law needs changing - BADLY!!0 -
I think giving a 'good reference' for a bad tenant is astonishing, and leads to other landlords having similar problems down the line.tomstickland wrote:Re references:
Why not?0 -
"""am I supposed to wait another 4 months until the end of the tenancy agreement to serve an 8 & 21, then another 2 months to take it to court?""
yes you are - welcome to the rather "skewed" world of landlord/tenant legislation.
then wait for the judge to order a Possesion order for 4 or 8 weeks, then wait for the tenants NOT to leave, then wait to go back to court, then get the judge to order the bailiffs in, then wait weeks for the bailiffs to arrive, then get the tenants out - then- usually, redecorate and recarpet thruout .........
A landlord i know started this eviction process in July last year - the tenants are still there. You need to get expert advice on this - join the National Landlords Association (joining fee tax deductible, adn you get cheaper house insurance also) - they have all the correct paperwork you need and an excellent legal helpline.
good luck0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
