We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
dodgy tenants
bearfreeman
Posts: 13 Forumite
I own 3 properties, got problems at 2.
One tenant refuses to pay any top up rent.
The other tenant has disappeared also owing top up rent, but now the main part of the rent has been stopped by the council.
Anyone got any thoughts on best way to deal with these oiks?
As far as I can see, the law seems to be on the side of the tenant, but they just seem to take the p***. The laws regarding letting seem very wrong, and need to be revamped!
Thanks,
One tenant refuses to pay any top up rent.
The other tenant has disappeared also owing top up rent, but now the main part of the rent has been stopped by the council.
Anyone got any thoughts on best way to deal with these oiks?
As far as I can see, the law seems to be on the side of the tenant, but they just seem to take the p***. The laws regarding letting seem very wrong, and need to be revamped!
Thanks,
0
Comments
-
You need to obviously evict them as quickly as possible, make sure you do this using the right methods and make sure you're clear in your reasons. Also warn them that finding future property will be hard once evicted as you will refuse references, obviously do not give a bad one.
Could i possibly ask a question? What methods did you use to get these Tenants in the 1st place? Did you perform the relevant checks?0 -
bearfreeman wrote:I own 3 properties, got problems at 2.
One tenant refuses to pay any top up rent.
The other tenant has disappeared also owing top up rent, but now the main part of the rent has been stopped by the council.
Anyone got any thoughts on best way to deal with these oiks?
As far as I can see, the law seems to be on the side of the tenant, but they just seem to take the p***. The laws regarding letting seem very wrong, and need to be revamped!
Thanks,
Sounds like LLs who avoid Housing Benefit may have a point. In private sector LLs always had employer details so could contact the boss and make trouble :eek:0 -
First one. I believe they need to be two months behind (or 8 weeks if on a weekly payment) before a court is likely to evict them. You can serve a Section 21 requiring them to leave (maybe so a relative can use the property
).
Second one. The council will not pay Housing Benefit if the claimant is not living at the property. I would take it that they have quit the property and suggest you make an effort to contact them to confirm this. If contact cannot be made, maybe you could smell gas as you walk past the property. This would allow you to legally force entry. When the source of the smell has been identified (and rectified by switching the cooker fully off) you could assess whether the tenant has indeed quit. Change the locks and re-let.
Another reason to avoid renting to HB claimaints in future.
Best wishes
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
tenants need to understand that the rent is their liability whether they get HB help or not. To refuse to pay the top up is like refusing to pay the agreed rent.
Worth remembering that tenants in receipt of HB generally have little spare money. To take on a tenant knowing they have to find a lot of top-up rent, you need to know that they have some support to make ends meet. This support should ideally take the form of a guarantor.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
I've recently taken a tenant on HB. Very nice chap and I see no problems - from him.
The HB office however, are another matter. Intrusive interrogation of my personal matters and threatening not to pay my tenat his HB if I did not answer their irrelevant questions.
And insurance. Cost me £60 extra because the tenant claims HB. Why?
No wonder there are so many adverts demanding 'No DSS' (even though it's now HB).
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote:I've recently taken a tenant on HB. Very nice chap and I see no problems - from him.
The HB office however, are another matter. Intrusive interrogation of my personal matters and threatening not to pay my tenat his HB if I did not answer their irrelevant questions.
And insurance. Cost me £60 extra because the tenant claims HB. Why?
No wonder there are so many adverts demanding 'No DSS' (even though it's now HB).
GG
Good luck GG!!FREEDOM IS NOT FREE0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote:I've recently taken a tenant on HB. Very nice chap and I see no problems - from him.
The HB office however, are another matter. Intrusive interrogation of my personal matters and threatening not to pay my tenat his HB if I did not answer their irrelevant questions.
And insurance. Cost me £60 extra because the tenant claims HB. Why?
No wonder there are so many adverts demanding 'No DSS' (even though it's now HB).
GG
They are without doubt a big risk, last year I had a problem Tenant on HB. She basically got with a group of local lads and was causing immense trouble in the house and in the street were she was renting our property. We had reports from local residents, the Police and the local authorities. We then had no choice but to evict her and at first her local council said they would fight it. Then the next stage went from this to them serving an ASBO on her and saying if I didn't evict her I would be served with one also. Unbelievable!0 -
barnaby-bear wrote:Sounds like LLs who avoid Housing Benefit may have a point. In private sector LLs always had employer details so could contact the boss and make trouble :eek:
I suspect that this would break several laws. Besides which, most employers would tell the landlord to mind their own business.0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote:I've recently taken a tenant on HB. Very nice chap and I see no problems - from him.
The HB office however, are another matter. Intrusive interrogation of my personal matters and threatening not to pay my tenat his HB if I did not answer their irrelevant questions.
And insurance. Cost me £60 extra because the tenant claims HB. Why?
GG
While there are many perfectly good tenants who receive housing benefit (I have been in this position at various times of my life) there are other people who are a landlord's and employer's nightmare, perhaps due to drugs and/or mental health problems. Statistically, people on HB are more likely than others to damage property, and so this is reflected in insurance premiums.0 -
Voyager2002 wrote:I suspect that this would break several laws. Besides which, most employers would tell the landlord to mind their own business.
??? Every LA I ever have had the "pleasure" to rent with has done an employer's reference and on a half month payment messing up on leaving one place - my employer was sent the missing money where is it letter.
To be honest if you have to pay your own rent and go to work to do it you are less likely to be a druggie, alcoholic, mentally ill etc... basically because such people aren't able to work.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
