Iphone 4 not working and out of warranty - what are my rights?

gjchester

NFH wrote: »

As already stated, the Sale of Goods Act is not relevavnt here, but the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

Can you show any case where this has been tried in court.

The airime agreement is a service agreement there are no goods involved.

grumbler

gjchester wrote: »

The airime agreement is a service agreement there are no goods involved.

If the networks make this agreement separate this doesn't change the fact that they supply both the services and the handset as a pack.

romedk

So guys - what is the conclusion?

Have I got no leg to stand on because I have no way of proving the fault was there at the time of manufacture?

gjchester

grumbler wrote: »

If the networks make this agreement separate this doesn't change the fact that they supply both the services and the handset as a pack.

I understand that. If thats the case then it should have been tested in lab by 10+ years mobile have been about...

Cars are sold on HP but the car ownership is seperated from the finance, why is this different.

NFH

gjchester wrote: »

Cars are sold on HP but the car ownership is seperated from the finance, why is this different.

Not true. Section 75 combines liability together between seller and lender.

NFH

romedk wrote: »

Have I got no leg to stand on because I have no way of proving the fault was there at the time of manufacture?

Ask Three whether they dispute whether there was a durability defect at the time of supply. If they do, then get an independent report carried out (maybe by a repairer). You can then use the report to claim the cost of the repair and report from Three under Section 11N of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.