PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

tree fell across road

not sure where to post this so sorry... but really need some advice asap
my husband owns land which is rented out to a farmer, recently a tree fell from this land into the road and a car hit into the fallen tree causeing damage to the vehicle. the local council cut up the tree after, this happened a week or so ago and ive just been told about it. am i liable to cover the damage?

Comments

  • mvteng
    mvteng Posts: 514 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    As I understand it, you are only liable if you can be shown to have been negligent.

    i.e. if you've had notice that the tree should have been attended to.

    If it was just a case of the storms blowing the tree down, the driver should claim from their own insurance.
  • thanks for that, was really worried about it!
  • Peater
    Peater Posts: 521 Forumite
    Considering the severity of the recent winds, i would find it unlikely that the driver could claim against you. C'est la vie!

    However, the council may try to present you with a bill for the removal of the tree.....
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Your husband is being negligent if he has no insurance to cover incidents like this. Anyone who has land should obtain cover for third party risks. Even if you don't invite people onto your land, you are still liable if someone has an accident there or in the vicinity, as in this case.

    As regards this particular tree, the council may well bill your husband for the work. Hopefully that will be a worst case scenario, but having had sight of the tree, they will be in a good position to say whether it came down by an act of God or because it was diseased.

    I agree with the other posters that with the severity of recent weather it's unlikely that the insurers would want to fight this or, unless they already know, try to contact the council, but having one's own insurance is the best way to sleep easy when you own any kind of land.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.