We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Husband will not share

135

Comments

  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,574 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As you're married you're well protected by the law, Sapphirie. If your husband dies intestate (without making a will) you'll inherit the first £250K of his estate and a life interest in the rest, i.e. you can't be evicted from your home even if it's worth more than £250K. If your husband does make a will, leaving everything to, say, children, then it becomes more complicated. However, wills can be contested and if you're living in the family home at the time of his death, this would be viewed favourably even if he's left the house to his children. There's more info here.

    The survivor inherits a life interest in half of the remainder so Sapphirie could be left in the position of having to sell the property in order to pay money over to her children.

    It's economic folly not to find out about these matters. There's enough to cope with when a spouse dies without getting sudden shocks about the house you live in.

    It would be worth finding out about the property from the Land Registry to see who owns it and whether there are any charges on it - https://www.landregistry.gov.uk/
  • Gavin83
    Gavin83 Posts: 8,757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    WhiteHorse wrote: »
    Good point.

    Odd behaviour like this often means that there is secret debt somewhere.

    I honestly don't think its odd behaviour. I wouldn't want to add my partners name to my business either unless they'd physically started it with me. He'd effectively be losing his shared decision making on the business and his brother would effectively become the leading director as he'd have the majority share of the business.
  • Gloomendoom
    Gloomendoom Posts: 16,551 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BJV wrote: »
    I thought that when you had lived with someone for a set period of time you where automatically entitled to half? Think it is mostly the little woman syndrome!:A

    Only if you are married or in a civil partnership. Cohabitees have no automatic entitlement.
  • roses
    roses Posts: 2,333 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I thought you are only entitled to a share if you can prove you financially contributed to the house?
  • conradmum
    conradmum Posts: 5,018 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    roses wrote: »
    I thought you are only entitled to a share if you can prove you financially contributed to the house?

    No, marriage alone confers a share in your partner's assets, though a judge would look at the length of the marriage when deciding how much. So, for example, if you'd been married for two months to a millionaire you probably wouldn't be awarded very much if you decided to divorce.
  • why do you think you have the right to be on the deeds for a house he is paying for?
  • Sapphirie wrote: »
    We have been married 14 years. When I moved in with him before we married he owned the house. He has repeatedly said that he cannot put my name on the mortgage or deeds as it will cost a lot of money. He bought our son a flat and both their names were on the deeds. He has a business with his brother and they are the only two partners. How do I persuade him to share as I feel that my name should be on everything with his?

    Playing devils advocate here, when he says he cannot put your name on the mortgage or deeds as it will cost a lot of money, I dont think he is referring to the bill to set it up.

    If god forbid your relationship turned sour and you two split, with your name on the deeds, he stands to lose half the value of a property he owns outright. Heres hoping yours is one that will always stand the test of time but many dont. He sounds like quite a savvy guy going by what you have advised of his financial affairs. Maybe he is just looking at this in a black and white way and doesn't want to give. Has he been in a marraige previously where he lost everything?
  • Lotus-eater
    Lotus-eater Posts: 10,792 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    why do you think you have the right to be on the deeds for a house he is paying for?
    Are you for real, you !!!!!?

    I don't know why I'm bothering answering you tbh.........
    Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.
  • Are you for real, you !!!!!?

    I don't know why I'm bothering answering you tbh.........

    you're right, best not answer me, i cant stand immature name callers like you

    bye bye
  • Lotus-eater
    Lotus-eater Posts: 10,792 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A thing comes to mind when the OP talks about businesses and friends and brothers.

    A couple who were our friends, he had a business or two, I was never really sure, the businesses were held between friends, who knew what was really going on, although she thought it was all above aboard on the surface. I certainly did with my dealings with him.

    He died, suddenly, another business suddenly surfaced and she was sure she would be OK, she now had a share in 2 businesses, all the guys were there at the funeral, all the partners showed their grief.

    When it came to it, she got nothing, nothing at all. On paper, she owned alot, in practice, it was worth nothing.
    It seems that business had a way of working which was alien to her. They were able to walk away with it all and she had a half share in nothing.
    ALL legal and proper.

    She was left, not in debt, but not in the way in which she thought her OH would have left her. She scrapes by with no pension and a mortgage.

    Never trust business partners, never trust anything you can't read in black and white legal terms.
    Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.