We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

£480 wk ben cap not enough for families in London to live on.

1246719

Comments

  • drc wrote: »
    He will until the anniversary of his claim. Then he will probably get some discretionary interim payment or they will find him a suitable council home. He has 8 kids so is probably a special case.

    what is special about it? kick him and his brood onto the street. scum.

    alternatively, let him buy a 9 bedroom house somewhere. yeah, thought not. heaven forbid he takes care of his own massive family.

    scum.
  • not only should this 25k limit per year be 12k (1k a month is more than enough hand outs) - a person being given a free home should NEVER be entitled to anything more than a 2 bedroom flat. if they want to put people in houses, they can share with others, like students and young WORKING people do.

    1 bedroom flat for singles and couples

    2 bedroom flat for everyone else - no matter how many kids they have. that wil stop the scum breeding like bacteria.
  • Imposition of a benefits cap will allow the market to find it's correct level.

    At the moment thousands of companies in London are having their employees subsidised by the taxpayer.
    If the benefits cap is rigorously imposed, then they will have to pay a decent market rate for their employees - or move out of London.

    It seems immoral that these companies are willing to pay a premium to bring bankers, accountants and brokers into the centre of the capital, but expect the taxpayer to subside the people who clean up after them, serve them food or provide their transport.
    Nothing is foolproof, as fools are so ingenious! :D
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    hardassets wrote: »
    That's nothing what about all those foreign families with more kids than years working getting £3000 and even £4000 a week paid rent?

    The question is what will happen to these big houses in the city of London? Can the LL make them into lots of smaller flats? No one in their right mind would pay £4000 a week out of their own pocket?

    Does anyone know how many people are getting thousands of pounds a week?
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Does anyone know how many people are getting thousands of pounds a week?

    I tried to find out some time ago but couldn't find the data. I'd imagine that it's few enough to make real little difference but enough to keep us enraged.

    I wondered if there'd been a freedom of information request for this data.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Does anyone know how many people are getting thousands of pounds a week?

    Not me. At a guess I'd say 'too many'.

    Having even several hundred examples of state housing support running into thousands a month highlights a broken housing administration system to me.

    We pay housing officers good money to do a good job. I wonder if they feel shackled and disillusioned with how the system allows these sort of excesses.
  • Imposition of a benefits cap will allow the market to find it's correct level.

    At the moment thousands of companies in London are having their employees subsidised by the taxpayer.
    If the benefits cap is rigorously imposed, then they will have to pay a decent market rate for their employees - or move out of London.

    It seems immoral that these companies are willing to pay a premium to bring bankers, accountants and brokers into the centre of the capital, but expect the taxpayer to subside the people who clean up after them, serve them food or provide their transport.


    True but the cap will bring down average rents, so get ready for lower rents and property prices all round.
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Does anyone know how many people are getting thousands of pounds a week?

    It doesn't matter how many are getting £1000's per week.

    Does anyone know how many housholds are getting more than around £240 in rent and council tax benefit? Because these are the ones who will either have to move to cheaper area, or use the other half of their benefit for rent. I do not think many will choose to use their other money for rent.

    Any LL's wanting to charge more than around £200 for their property will have a hard time finding a tenant one the cap comes in.
    Monetary precious metals are in a long term bull market.

    Property is in a long term bear market.
  • Kirri
    Kirri Posts: 6,184 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    domcastro wrote: »
    The inner London estates need breaking up. I'm hoping the benefit caps will improve London. The voluntary unemployed need to be separated from one another. Yes, they'll probably riot and loot but next time they'll get shot with rubber bullets and then have to move

    Agree re the estates but then where would they go to, would this not spread the problem? At least at the moment there are whole areas of inner London I can avoid at present.. It's so ingrained in them I just see problem areas being spread further if they move out.. :(
    not only should this 25k limit per year be 12k (1k a month is more than enough hand outs) - a person being given a free home should NEVER be entitled to anything more than a 2 bedroom flat. if they want to put people in houses, they can share with others, like students and young WORKING people do.

    1 bedroom flat for singles and couples

    2 bedroom flat for everyone else - no matter how many kids they have. that wil stop the scum breeding like bacteria.

    Even where I am in outer London, rents have gone up this year - studio flats going for £650 now! I agree on capping the limits as working people in average jobs don't have that much spare cash and I think the Government are still being over generous with their amounts, but the BTL landlords are so greedy..
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kabayiri wrote: »
    Not me. At a guess I'd say 'too many'.

    Having even several hundred examples of state housing support running into thousands a month highlights a broken housing administration system to me.

    We pay housing officers good money to do a good job. I wonder if they feel shackled and disillusioned with how the system allows these sort of excesses.

    I'd agree it's to many as you don't have to move to far away to reduce it considerably, but have you any real proof that it is several hundred .
  • Kirri wrote: »
    Agree re the estates but then where would they go to, would this not spread the problem? At least at the moment there are whole areas of inner London I can avoid at present.. It's so ingrained in them I just see problem areas being spread further if they move out.. :(



    Even where I am in outer London, rents have gone up this year - studio flats going for £650 now! I agree on capping the limits as working people in average jobs don't have that much spare cash and I think the Government are still being over generous with their amounts, but the BTL landlords are so greedy..


    No doubt that the high housing benefit payments have pushed up rents. Greedy LL's will have a hard time finding tenants now for any properties over £240 a week.

    Where are you in outer London? I mean £650 for a studio? What will al the families with kids do in your area when they all need to find a place for about £200 a week?
    Monetary precious metals are in a long term bull market.

    Property is in a long term bear market.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.