We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Disputed Liability
Options
Comments
-
and with the impact point then it would have only been from one angle
But how does this prove the other car drove into you?
Could you not have driven into the other car at that exact opposite angle?
If it's a physically impossibility then you have the case sewn up, but I suspect you could theorectically have driven at the exact opposite angle to produce the same damage.
If you don't think I'm right and it was a physical impossibility for you to have driven into the other car at that angle, then you have your answer. Simply provide the proof that it's physically impossible and you'll win your case if it really is true.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards