We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Chip & PIN Weakness Revealed
Comments
-
Using the PIN and card at an ATM is not fraud. You are not deceiving anyone. In Scotland it is classed as Theft by Opening Lockfast Places, a crime at common law as opposed to one under statute. You are effectively using the 'key' to 'open' the secure place.
The debate is very interesting - loads of PIN hacking/skimming ongoing, but then it was the same with the old mag stripe cards. Suppose C&Sig cards might be technically more secure, yet the fallibility is in the signature as opposed to the PIN.0 -
Your right the fallibility with Chip & Signature in shops is the Signature - But the liability - isn't the victims.
As for ATMs - no PIN = no liability whatsoever.0 -
James wrote:Your right the fallibility with Chip & Signature in shops is the Signature - But the liability - isn't the victims.
The liability shift introduced with chips was from the banks to the businesses, not from the bank to the customers: http://www.chipandpin.co.uk/business/card_payments/means/shift_liability.htmlConjugating the verb 'to be":
-o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries0 -
Hot from the Press:
John Scott-Hubbard and Brian Warburton doctored the devices so they would record customers' secret pin numbers.
Only one of the 41 chip and pin machines they doctored has been found, meaning hundreds of people could have had their details stolen in the scam
The Judge summed up:
'In the part you played, in my judgment, you were instrumental in the significant increase in the level of credit card fraud since the chip and pin scheme was introduced, a scheme designed to combat if not eliminate this class of fraud.'
Click here for full story:0 -
James wrote:Hot from the Press:
John Scott-Hubbard and Brian Warburton doctored the devices so they would record customers' secret pin numbers.
Only one of the 41 chip and pin machines they doctored has been found, meaning hundreds of people could have had their details stolen in the scam
The Judge summed up:
'In the part you played, in my judgment, you were instrumental in the significant increase in the level of credit card fraud since the chip and pin scheme was introduced, a scheme designed to combat if not eliminate this class of fraud.'
Click here for full story:
Yes, yes - we've heard it from you before many times. They still can't copy the chip though so still better off with a chip and pin card.
Really - try thinking this through before posting this drivel.0 -
Tootsie_Roll wrote:Yes, yes - we've heard it from you before many times. They still can't copy the chip though so still better off with a chip and pin card.
Really - try thinking this through before posting this drivel.
Hi,
Last week they were on about Alliance & Leicester and Barclays but there may also be other banks that if your pin no. gets stolen and your card is used with the pin they will not accept responsibility. Watchdog did a quick con showing how easy it was to steal a pin no. but the said banks would not reimburse a pensioner who had thousands stolen out of her account via "hole in wall".
MY QUESTION IS:-
WHICH BANKS OUT THERE DO COVER YOU FOR THIS? HOW CAN YOU FIND OUT WHICH THEY ARE PLEASE?0 -
Idiophreak wrote:*sobs*
I just don't understand what this has to do with chip and pin at all!?
You could already do this with an "old skool" card?
READ IT AGAIN THEN YOU'LL SEE0 -
roger9
Please look through the numerous postings about this already. The Watchdog article was very misleading.0 -
James wrote:It's all in the sPIN.
Theft your absolutely right.
Fraud, well I'd argue that someone else pretending to be the real card owner and using the correct PIN, (and according to the Northampton Chip & PIN trial - a PIN proves that the person using the card is the righful owner), then this is ID Theft or Fraud.
How does using the pin no. prove you own it?0 -
James wrote:It's all in the sPIN.
Theft your absolutely right.
Fraud, well I'd argue that someone else pretending to be the real card owner and using the correct PIN, (and according to the Northampton Chip & PIN trial - a PIN proves that the person using the card is the righful owner), then this is ID Theft or Fraud.
How does using the pin no. prove you own it?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards