We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Problem tenants not paying rent !!!!
Options
Comments
-
Oh dear. Another letting agent without a clue.
Join the NLA right now, & get them to talk you through exactly what you need to do & what forms need filling in, & how.
It sounds like both tenants are named on the AST, and yet the agents have only served notice on one.
Why one tenant is named both as a tenant & permitted occupier is beyond me. Did the agent think there were two of him?
You'll need to re-serve notice properly. Get the NLA to help you with this, don't trust the agents to do this properly.
Get the agent to email you now (& post too) a full copy of all the documents they hold, including this guarantor 'agreement'. Once you have a copy & post it here (minus names) someone will tell you if it's actually valid.0 -
bikingbarney wrote: »G_M I am not being vague !!yes you are - see below!
what I have wrote is correct
I have 2 tenants :- tenant x... working male
tenant y... non working female
BOTH are listed as tenants on the tenancy agreement
tenant x is also listed as permitted occupier?? ignore. This is a meaningless clause since x is a tenant.
how can this be right ??it isn't. it has no legal meaning but shows how unreliable the agent is
spoke to letting agent today, they have a seperate covenant/deed that the guarantor has signed. Too vague! Which is it? Get a copy. As asked several times already, is it executed as a deed? Is it witnessed?
hope this helps
EDIT s21 is only lists tenant y on it and not tenant x??
Now do you see why we keep asking for precise details?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards