We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Expert prediction for 2012: Down!
Comments
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I agree with this, but you claimed to have bought (past tense) in Dec 09 when this clearly wasn;t the case.
No, no. I did indeed buy in December 2009. Completion was in feb 2010.
Though I was clear on this.
So effectively, at that point, you've bought.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Indeed, signing of the missives legally commits you to complete the buying process,
There was never any point in discussing it light. I'd doesn't matter. Never did.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »There's no point in discussing this further as you clearly cannot grasp the simple concept.
Like I said. If only you had JUST congratulated me.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I did congratulate you, more than once.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »You must have missed it as your reading glassess transfers tect into a different arrangement something that implores you to argue against regardless of the meaning.
ha ha. Classic. Probably best not to sarcastically refer to someone needing “reading glassess”
Oh dear. Slim pickin's in the little book of fallbacks, clearly.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Maybe I should have been congratulating your better half as they obviously decided to go against your wishes to become a homeowner
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »LOL, I did answer it before, again you must have missed it as the red mist decends in front of you.
Yeah. Where did you do that then?IveSeenTheLight wrote: »LOL, I did answer it before, again you must have missed it as the red mist decends in front of you.
"What does it matter" - It doesn't really
Finally you get something right.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »"Who bleeding cares" - you obviously continuin to try and squirm a "geneer" concept into the main world instead of accepting when you bought.
I bought in December. I made an offer and it was accepted.
I can't imagine anyone's ever cried “worlf” lite. Looks like you might need “reading glassess”.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »It's the comedy seeing you squirm that draws others in yo oust you.
As well as being a storyteller, you have the essence of the boy who cried worlf.
Though it transpires that I was telling the truth, and the denialist conspiracy theorists, got it rather wrong, didn't you.
Which rather clarifies who's really been doing the squirming.IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Every lier has their comeuppance.
Indeed. And you got served.0 -
Best of luck to you in geneers world and definitions.
Hope it doesn't conflict too much with the real world:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Best of luck to you in geneers world and definitions.
Hope it doesn't conflict too much with the real world
Even with my "reading glassess" on, I'm not really sure what you're banging on about now.
Though of course its highly likely that "it doesn't really matter".
0 -
Indeed.Even with my "reading glassess" on, I'm not really sure what you're banging on about now.
Though of course its highly likely that "it doesn't really matter".
none of geneers posts appear to matter.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
No, no. I did indeed buy in December 2009. Completion was in feb 2010.
Though I was clear on this.
You brought in February 2010 then. The date you agree a figures is not the date you have purchased, the date you complete is.
Your purchase would be in the February LR statistics not Decembers wouldn't they?
Not sure why anyone would claim they purchased before the completion date? Before that date all you have done is agreed a price.0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Indeed.
Yeah. 20 post later and it doesn't matter. :rotfl:0 -
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Just see my signature.
Thats nice.
Big of you to admit that your spelling, syntax and terminology gets a bit loopy when you're typing angry. 0 -
Thats nice.
Big of you to admit that your spelling, syntax and terminology gets a bit loopy when you're typing angry.
If that's what you like to think. I'm not going to get into a debate with you over. I'm happy that you think you've got the upper hand.
I'm not a typist.
When I type on forums I don;t get my knickers in a twist over spelling and syntax.
Those that revert to this type of argument usually do so when they have lost an argument.
Modern technology does make you sloppy when you can bash out a responce, hit F7 and do a spell check. It saves so much time.
Did you go to secretarial studies to be so impervious to syntax or spelling errors?
Maybe you need to take a class on definitions
On that subject (terminology), there are many that don't agree with the geneer dictionary of definitions.
I don't believe it is as widely published as more established books.
Incidently, did you know?
http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »If that's what you like to think. I'm not going to get into a debate with you over. I'm happy that you think you've got the upper hand.
I'm not a typist.
When I type on forums I don;t get my knickers in a twist over spelling and syntax.
Those that revert to this type of argument usually do so when they have lost an argument.
Modern technology does make you sloppy when you can bash out a responce, hit F7 and do a spell check. It saves so much time.
Did you go to secretarial studies to be so impervious to syntax or spelling errors?
Maybe you need to take a class on definitions
On that subject (terminology), there are many that don't agree with the geneer dictionary of definitions.
I don't believe it is as widely published as more established books.
Incidently, did you know?
http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/
Word of advice. The secret with meaningless ripostes is so keep them short and pithy.;)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards