Expert prediction for 2012: Down!

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

Don't worry, be happy.

I'm happy to reconsider when you give me decent evidence. I don't mind retracting everything I have said once I see evidence that makes me go "Oh, OK, looks like, this once, geneer was telling the truth". I haven't seen that evidence so far so keep pulling the cats from the bag, but they need to be better cats than a numeric avatar :rotfl:.

Its quite a transparent swerve RM.
But what you have seen is more than sufficient, and certainly exposed the boss-eyed nature of your denial.

I've even given you pretty much exactly what you asked for, and still you can't bring yourself to admit the obvious truth.

You're good value for money, I'll give you that.

RenovationMan wrote: »

No I haven't, I answered your previous points on an earlier post. I can't help it if you then edited your post. Look up the thread geneer. *sigh* you really are slow! :rotfl:

Actually no.

In reality I posted this.

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=49702267&postcount=217

And you elected to pursue me about mortgage sums.
Which don't matter at all.

geneer

JonnyBravo wrote: »

He's always hiding something.
It's part of creating "wriggle room" for later when some argument or other can be won be a bit of fact manipulation.

I'm hiding the precise sum of my mortgage.
Which is probably understandable to most, and certainly irrelevant to the discussion.

Jonny, you really are firing blanks.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

Its quite a nice swerve RM.
But what you have seen is more than sufficient, and certainly exposed the boss-eyed nature of your denial.

I've even given you pretty much exactly what you asked for, and still you can't bring yourself to admit the obvious truth.

You're good value for money, I'll give you that.

I thought you were going to pull more cats out of the bag?

What's up, bag empty? :rotfl::rotfl:

Come on geneer, why won't you show the monthly mortgage amount? What harm will it do except to potentially reveal your lie (mathematics never lies) or reduce your 'wriggle room' in future discussions?

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

I thought you were going to pull more cats out of the bag?

What's up, bag empty? :rotfl::rotfl:

Come on geneer, why won't you show the monthly mortgage amount? What harm will it do except to potentially reveal your lie (mathematics never lies) or reduce your 'wriggle room' in future discussions?

The current cat seems to be holding up quite alright thanks.

Still banging on about mortgage amounts? Why?

You've seen everything but the first digit.
This was originally enough for your ill considered back firing victory dance.
Whats changed?

Oh and lets not forget the total sum of evidence thanks.
Context is important.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

The current cat seems to be holding up quite alright thanks.

Still banging on about mortgage amounts? Why?

You've seen everything but the first digit.
This was originally enough for your ill considered back firing victory dance.
Whats changed?

Oh and lets not forget the total sum of evidence thanks.
Context is important.

I've already pulled apart your other 'evidence' as you requested. I don't see why you won't show the full mortgage amount unless you have something to hide.

What do you have to hide?

Here is a new avatar for you geneer:

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

I've already pulled apart your other 'evidence' as you requested. I don't see why you won't show the full mortgage amount unless you have something to hide.

What do you have to hide?

Here is a new avatar for you geneer:

You've pulled apart nothing. On consideration, you've managed to conclude that my evidence isn't the evidence you wouldn't have chosen, therefore my evidence doesn't count. Bonkers.

Again, your trying to deflect away from my relevant questions.
So Allow me to repeat.

Still banging on about mortgage amounts? Why?

You've seen everything but the first digit.
This was originally enough for your ill considered back firing victory dance.
Whats changed?

Oh and lets not forget the total sum of evidence thanks.
Context is important.

RenovationMan

Oh well, that was fun. geneer still won't show his mortgage amount so we have no idea, mathematically, whether it is correct or not. He also didn't supplt any other transactions so we could see the history of mortgage payments from Jan 2010 until Dec 2011.

And he wonders why no one believes him :rotfl:

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

Oh well, that was fun. geneer still won't show his mortgage amount so we have no idea, mathematically, whether it is correct or not. He also didn't supplt any other transactions so we could see the history of mortgage payments from Jan 2010 until Dec 2011.

And he wonders why no one believes him :rotfl:

It was fun wasn't it.
Just seeing what boggle eyed lengths your desperate need for denial would take you too.
So You're going to run with this then? :rotfl:

You know that "mathematically" the last four digits of my mortgage payments are clear to see. You can see that they match.
What has changed?

You simply don't need to see the first digit, and I don't want to show it to you.

As noted, you thought this was perfectly adequate when you crowed that you'd caught me out, completely ignorant of the fact the first payment was only a partial payment.
What has changed?

You've been exposed as a tin foil hatter, rejecting ever more compelling evidence because it doesn't suit your obsession, and you know it.
The reason you've adopted such a weak fall back (nooooo I need to know the exact amount of your mortgage!) is because you consider it better than admitting the truth.
Which is hugely satisfying in and of itself.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

It was fun wasn't it.
Just seeing what boggle eyed lengths your desperate need for denial would take you too.

You're revealing an astonishing lack of self awareness here. Can you not see the boggle eyed length your desperate need for affirmation has taken you to?

Why are you so desperate for people to believe your story? For me, as an individual to believe your story?

Jack_Johnson_the_acorn

geneer wrote: »

It was fun wasn't it.
Just seeing what boggle eyed lengths your desperate need for denial would take you too.
So You're going to run with this then? :rotfl:

You know that "mathematically" the last four digits of my mortgage payments are clear to see. You can see that they match.
What has changed?

You simply don't need to see the first digit, and I don't want to show it to you.

As noted, you thought this was perfectly adequate when you crowed that you'd caught me out, completely ignorant of the fact the first payment was only a partial payment.
What has changed?

You've been exposed as a tin foil hatter, rejecting ever more compelling evidence because it doesn't suit your obsession, and you know it.
The reason you've adopted such a weak fall back (nooooo I need to know the exact amount of your mortgage!) is because you consider it better than admitting the truth.
Which is hugely satisfying in and of itself.

Are you still renting with your sister Geneer? so long as you have seperate bedrooms eh;)