Expert prediction for 2012: Down!

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=49700597&postcount=192 :rotfl:

Erm, that's just a post that I commented on already. However I'll do it all again...

"So what were they marking RM? And how come the just happen to coincide with December."

Avatar evidence - Could have indicated anything. No post was created in 2010 to say why the numbered avatars were being used, so we just have your word for it that they were used to indicate a house purchase counter.

"I don't have a halifax current account.
I have an RBS current account.
The mortgage is with Halifax.
Hence my RBS account shows regular monthly payments to Halifax.
As well as a facility to make one off payments to HBOS Mortgage, a little something you keep forgetting to mention.
Oh, and you forgot the clearly marked "INITIAL PAYMENT" tag, which suggests this is the start of something."

Screenshot evidence - As I have proved with my screenshot showing 'your' Halifax account containing almost half a billion in cash, screenshots can be doctored. We just have your word for it that your screenshots weren't doctored.

":rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:"vague comments" which lets face it basically say " I BOUGHT - BIG WINK". Right you are RM."

Historical post evidence - In your mind they may 'basically' say "I bought" but they actuallt DON'T say "I bought". They are vague posts that could be interpreted to back up anything, we just have your word for it that they say "I bought".

I'll say again (and you'll ignore it again), if I had spent 5 years arguing with the same people, if i had bought a house at the bottom of a housing crash, if I decided to play a trick on these people over the duration of 2 years, I would have made sure I had better evidence than the flimsy stuff above. I would have PMed my bear mates to let them in on the gag and I would have created a post, under a sockie username on an obscure thread on CC or on here that said "I bought in December 2009, this is my proof!" and I would have linked to it now.

We just have your word for it that you bought in 2009 and I have to say that I have always thought you were a stranger to the truth (and said so in historical posts - how that for proof!) and nothing you have said so far has concined me at all that you are now telling the truth.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

Yes. Who could imagine that the first payment might not be for a full month.

LOL!!!!!!;)

Why are you still hiding the amounts? I didn't ask you to prove that the first month's payment was different from the others, I asked you to show the full amount so that mathematically you will be caught if you are lying. The fact you chose not to reveal it speaks volumes. That's what is so funny.

geneer

Thats nice Renovation man. So basically your most compelling evidence that I didn't buy is the fact that I didn't say "I BOUGHT" when I bought,
despite the fact that not saying the same was in intrinsic, one might even say essential part, of the wind up?

You're not afraid that your starting to look a bit....not right.
Even your pals have pulled back from the denialist position.
You are very much on your own here.

Just on your own. Caring. Very much.

RenovationMan wrote: »

Why are you still hiding the amounts? I didn't ask you to prove that the first month's payment was different from the others, I asked you to show the full amount so that mathematically you will be caught if you are lying. The fact you chose not to reveal it speaks volumes. That's what is so funny.

Because I'm not telling you my mortgage size. Unequivocally, categorically, thats not going to happen.
But you've seen enough of the amounts

But course I've shown you enough of the amounts as you need to to see they are similar.
Clearly you saw enough for you to do your backfiring victory dance.
Which you've immediately ejected from your mind I see.:rotfl:

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

Thats nice Renovation man. So basically you're evidence that I didn't buy is the fact that I didn't say "I BOUGHT" when I bought,
despite the fact that not saying the same was in intrinsic, one might even say essential part, of the wind up?

NO..... that's not what I said. *sigh* you really are slow aren't you geneer? I'll say it again, sssllllooowwwllllyyyyy (thats 'slowly', said really slowly) for you...

You didn't need to say you had bought when you bought using you 'geneer' user. You could have created a new sockie when you bought and posted "I've bought, this is my proof" or you could have PMed your bear mates on CC when you bought and let them into the 'wind up'.

You didn't do either of them.

geneer wrote: »

You're not afraid that your starting to look a bit....not right.
Even your pals have pulled back from the denialist position.
You are on your own here.

Just on your own. Caring. Very much.

You keep saying this. You hate the fact that I'm pulling apart your 'wind up'. You really, really want me to stop pulling you apart. I'm not going to, it's too much fun:rotfl:

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

NO..... that's not what I said. *sigh* you really are slow aren't you geneer? I'll say it again, sssllllooowwwllllyyyyy (thats 'slowly', said really slowly) for you...

You didn't need to say you had bought when you bought using you 'geneer' user. You could have created a new sockie when you bought and posted "I've bought, this is my proof" or you could have PMed your bear mates on CC when you bought and let them into the giggle.

You didn't do either of them.

Ah right. So your clear evidence that I didn't buy is that I didn't choose exactly one of the ways you've decided you would have used to let it be known, and this effectively negates all the things I did in fact choose to do.

Which includes giving you pretty much exactly what you asked for.

That equation might balance in your head, but can't say its passing muster in the real world.

Given that I have in fact done exactly what I said I've done,
I really am just going to keep pulling cats out of the bag.

Are you sure you don't want to reconsider RM?
I'm actually starting to worry for you.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

Because I'm not telling you my mortgage size. Unequivocally, categorically, thats not going to happen.

Why not? What are you afraid of?

You've seen mine posted on the internet on this very forum and the sky didn't fall in. I've mentioned them before, no worries because I've nothing to hide. What do you have to hide, geneer?

geneer

RenovationMan wrote: »

Why not? What are you afraid of?

You've seen mine posted on the internet on this very forum and the sky didn't fall in. I've mentioned them before, no worries because I've nothing to hide. What do you have to hide, geneer?

I want to hide the total size of my mortgage amount.
Obviously.
It is also irrelevant to the date which I purchased.

You have of course elected to pursue an irrelevance.
At the same time glossing over a few of apposite and important points.

I hardy ever see you guys pull a move like that.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

I really am just going to keep pulling cats out of the bag.

Are you sure you don't want to reconsider RM?
I'm actually starting to worry for you.

Don't worry, be happy.

I'm happy to reconsider when you give me decent evidence. I don't mind retracting everything I have said once I see evidence that makes me go "Oh, OK, looks like, this once, geneer was telling the truth". I haven't seen that evidence so far so keep pulling the cats from the bag, but they need to be better cats than a numeric avatar :rotfl:.

JonnyBravo

He's always hiding something.
It's part of creating "wriggle room" for later when some argument or other can be won be a bit of fact manipulation.

RenovationMan

geneer wrote: »

I want to hide the total size of my mortgage amount.
Obviously.
It is also irrelevant of course.

You "missed" a few of my previous points.
Or course.

No I haven't, I answered your previous points on an earlier post. I can't help it if you then edited your post. Look up the thread geneer. *sigh* you really are slow! :rotfl: