We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Compulsory Purchase Orders...any help?
Comments
-
oursurveysays wrote: »As a basic rule of thumb:
Property Value: £100,000
Basic Loss Payment: £7,500
Occupiers Loss Payment: £2,500
Home Loss Payment: £10,000
Plus disturbance and fees
Based on the above you would get £120,000 for a property worth £100,000 so unless you have an really unrealistic idea of your properties value or paid a rediculous sum for it you should be OK.
That's pretty good news then assuming the valuation is accurate and then 20% on top for the inconvenience of it all.It's someone else's fault.0 -
ps having read a few of the latter posts it would appear the CPO has not been served and the AA are entering into negotiations. Still seek its permission to appoint a surveyor to act in negotiation and valuation and they will advise you on how to maximise the situation. The AA would prefer not to CPO so you do have some milage in getting as much as you can out of them. A surveyor however will know the tricks on how to maximise the offer you will get. You could as someone suggested hang fire - but I don't think that is always wise. If you are unrealistic then as a last resort the AA will simply get p***ed off and slap a CPO on you and you may get less than originally offered. My opinion (and it is just that) - get advice, get as much as you can and get on with your life. See this as an opportunity to get more than the value of your home in the current market. Don't forget that whilst you might not get what the property was worth 3/4 years ago you will also be buying in a market where values on not what they were 3/4 years ago so you will either be trading up or banking cash and buying a comperable property.0
-
That's pretty good news then assuming the valuation is accurate and then 20% on top for the inconvenience of it all.
As I said I am a commercial surveyor and certainly as a result of the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act brought in these loss payments. Certainly for commercial property the basic and loss payments are a given and I assume the home loss payments is an additional extra and the lot can be claimed. As I said to the OP seek the advice of a resi chartered surveyor with experience of Compulsory Purchase, get what you can and trade up in a falling market. You should not lose out by this.
Edit: looks like basic loss payments are not for resi properties - still though the home loss and occupiers loss is not to be sniffed at - 8 years ago you would not have got anything.0 -
Big thanks to oursurveysays...a big sigh of relief in that we can negotiate and will have some level of compensation, we aren't unrealistic in our expections and given your information will use it wisely.
£12 million worth of bridge repairs had been scheduled to start in March closing a main road for a year which has now been put on hold so I'm assuming it's being seriously thought about rather than a previous idea in the pipeline that has been discussed for years. Almost a 'while we're there' thought. Though some surveyor thinks it will only cost an extra 8 million to add in a junction...think I'll find out who they are and avoid as that woul just about cover the purchase of the streets houses!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards