Broken window in tenanted property

lighting_up_the_chalice

clutton wrote: »

go to User CP at the top of the page.....scroll down to Edit Ignore List... enter users name. ... save... simples

Cheers Clutton, but I like the idea of freedom from censorship or ignorance of that kind and some of you need a little help sometimes, so I'm happy to reply to anyone.

clutton_2

This message is hidden because lighting up the chalice is on your ignore list.



shucks... can i hear the distant sound of someone hammering on my door to get my attention ?? ...... no i dont think i will let you in LUTC - its much more peaceful this way.... you are in excellent company by the way......

Googlies_2

lighting_up_the_chalice wrote: »

(sigh)... In reply to.....



You posted....



I was asking why you felt that to be a "straw man argument"? Seems simple enough..... even for you.

Nope now you are simply lying, you asked me how I concluded from this

"Threat made to tenants home. Did they...
Notify the landlord for her to take appropriate action to protect their property?... No.
Notify the relevant authority of a stated intent to commit a crime?... No.
Do anything that may have either prevented or mitigated the loss?... No."

that the landlord was liable.

I have never stated where I think the liability lies, and I couldnt of concluded from that anyway as you had yet to write it, you simply made up a straw man argument.

You seem to be unable to follow your own arguments.

clutton_2

Googlies.... i doubt LUTC could follow his own .. well.. goolies........ not to put too fine a point on things....

lighting_up_the_chalice

Googlies wrote: »

After I had posted you wrote;

How could I have possibly made a conclusion from something you had yet to write?

Post # 137 should assist with your confusion. Do keep up.

lighting_up_the_chalice

clutton wrote: »

Googlies.... i doubt LUTC could follow his own .. well.. goolies........ not to put too fine a point on things....

Has me on ignore, yet can't seem to follow it through herself...... Hmmmmm. Clutton.... I think this could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship.

Googlies_2

clutton wrote: »

Googlies.... i doubt LUTC could follow his own .. well.. goolies........ not to put too fine a point on things....

I dont mind a little argy bargy on the forums but I think this one is intellectually unarmed.

lighting_up_the_chalice

Googlies wrote: »

I dont mind a little argy bargy on the forums but I think this one is intellectually unarmed.

For someone who whines about rudeness, you do like to give it some, don't you? Hypocrite.

jamie11

A small prayer.

Dear God,
Please explain from your mighty wisdom why the landlord cannot pay for the window and then sue the culprit (if known) through the courts?

Amen

clutton_2

because a 16 y ear old scroat who breaks windows wont have any money to be sued for, and the LL will be even MORE out of pocket after paying court fees ..... and LL cant claim on insurance as the cost will be less than the excess anyway.... landlord stuffed......