We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Public Sector Strike(s)
Comments
-
That was me posh talk in case mr cameron was reading it.:)
I would love him to come for one of them handshake visits to a site i was working on. His hand would end up covered in all kinds:rotfl:
Did you see him with his rigger boots on ? he was doing it wrong:rotfl:
Guess he won't be picking up the tab for the dry cleaning.
Or GO in his nice shiny hi vis outfits."If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
MacMickster wrote: »In his statement today, the chancellor apears to have declared war on the public sector:
- Following a 2 year pay freeze, there will be 2 years of only 1% average wage increase (while inflation is running at 5%). For many this will mean a 4 year pay freeze.
- Looking to move towards regional pay for the public sector - so not only a 4 year pay freeze, but a potential pay cut for those in the more disadvantaged areas of the UK.
- A further increase in state pension age, and hence in the pension age for the proposed new public service pensions, for which workers will have to pay more from their reduced wages.
The private sector company i work for has no pension provisions for its workers, and when the banking led crisis hit us, we were faced with job losses, rather than this we all took a cut in salary, now things have improved for us were back on full salary and given a generous payrise, how many in the public sector would do this, none because theyre all take and no give, i have worked for some very good employers in the private sector, you have to admit there is a difference in attitudes between the public and private sectors, the country is in bad shape at the present time and we all need to work more and demand less to get us through this mess, it looks like the public sector dont want to get out of recession.0 -
exartillery1959 wrote: »The private sector company i work for has no pension provisions for its workers, and when the banking led crisis hit us, we were faced with job losses, rather than this we all took a cut in salary, now things have improved for us were back on full salary and given a generous payrise, how many in the public sector would do this, none because theyre all take and no give, i have worked for some very good employers in the private sector, you have to admit there is a difference in attitudes between the public and private sectors, the country is in bad shape at the present time and we all need to work more and demand less to get us through this mess, it looks like the public sector dont want to get out of recession.
Your situation sounds completely different. At least your employer was good enough to reverse the pay cut when times got better. For the public sector the reduction in compensation is going to be permanent end of story.
The other difference is that there have been job losses in the public sector - some of them quite savage with even more to come. So its not a case of a bit of give and take trading jobs for less pay etc - its less jobs, less pay and less pension with no negotiation.0 -
exartillery1959 wrote: »we were faced with job losses, rather than this we all took a cut in salary, now things have improved for us were back on full salary and given a generous payrise, how many in the public sector would do this, none because theyre all take and no give,
Actually that's not true. On top of a wage freeze, where I work we are having weekend working supplement and weighting removed. That's a reduction of about 7-8% for many, with no chance of getting back to the previous full salary or being given a generous payrise. So remind me again, who's all take and no give?Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
Public sector workers pay less NI
http://www.rosaltmann.com/hutton_press_release_contract_out_2aug10.htm0 -
Public sector workers pay less NI
http://www.rosaltmann.com/hutton_press_release_contract_out_2aug10.htm
and that is becasue, despite what that articles says, they don't receive S2P0 -
DEATHWISH_GHUOL wrote: »These public sector parasites wouldn't know a hard days work if it came along and punched them in the face. Which is all they deserve incidently.
Not getting on with the staff at the job centre during your regular visits down there?
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Loser.0 -
I work in the private sector, but sympathise with the strikers. Most public sector workers we can't do without. And a lot are under paid, over worked now this. If they didn't make a stand their conditions would get worse and worse. A lot of myths being spouting about their "huge" pensions. People shoud read up on the facts before being so judgemental.0
-
People should read the offer before spouting off in the other direction too. It's excellent.
The only thing wrong with the Public sector pensions offer really is that the phase in of higher contributions is too fast and will force some of the lower paid out of the scheme because it allows no time to adjust budgets - that needs to be fixed. Beyond that it's a great deal and is properly designed by a Labour peer to sustain excellence in public service pensions into the future.
The argument always seems to be pulled down to the "why should we penalise dinner ladies and nurses". Well the Labour party didn't have any scruples about penalising lower paid workers in the private sectors by raiding private pensions, did they? It's a bit late to get precious now.0 -
I dont even think they have noticed that the average working man is getting quite angry at them.
I think the average working man (I hate that phrase, but I know what you're getting at) is, in the main quite happy the government is doing something to ensure that public sector pensions become more affordable and sustainable. If the strikes last week showed anything it was that the majority of people don't seem to have that much sympathy with the people striking as they feel that the public sector get a pretty good deal as it is. I cannot stand all the public sector bashing I saw last week, but I think this is one issue where the 'average working man' is more on the side of the government than public sector workers who striked.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards