Not the father

neverdespairgirl

kevin137 wrote: »

They are NOT above the law, in fact they don't even use law to make collections, and this argument has and will be realised many many times, they use legislation, which to be a part of, you must agree to, in effect creating a contract...!

Legislation is part of the law.

The CSA was set up under the Child Support Act 1991. They are governed by various statutes and statutory instruments.

kevin137 wrote: »

A Magistrate, or Judge, who is acting on behalf of, yes you got it, the Secretary of State...! Stink of corruption it seems...!

Magistrates and judges don't act on behalf of the SSHD.

kevin137 wrote: »

And i have in fact sat in front of of court and asked the so called judge for a copy of there commission of oath, and was told by doing so i could be held in contempt of court...! Really...? Is that so...? And you can be arrested for impersonating a judge...!

Why did you do that, exactly?

kevin137

neverdespairgirl wrote: »

Why did you do that, exactly?

Because it is NOT always a judge that sits on the cases, it is sometimes from a pool of solicitors that can represent, but they must still have a commission of oath.

neverdespairgirl wrote: »

Legislation is part of the law.

The CSA was set up under the Child Support Act 1991. They are governed by various statutes and statutory instruments.

And statute law is legislation, which is an agreement between parties, and must have your agreement.

Go back to way back when and look at Magna Carta...! Read it thoroughly and you will understand that without agreement it doesn't actually have any legal standing in the UK...!