We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
One in Four full time workers to earn £42k+ by 2015
HAMISH_MCTAVISH
Posts: 28,592 Forumite
Grant Thornton, the accountancy firm, says that if wages increase at the rate predicted by government economists there will be a record 5.5 million higher rate taxpayers by 2015 earning more than £42,475 per year.
The number of people in full-time employment is approximately 21 million.
There are a further 8 million part timers, and 4 million self employed/contractors.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/8900873/1.4m-extra-people-to-pay-higher-rate-tax.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/8139883/Number-of-part-time-workers-hits-record-high-as-firms-reluctant-to-take-on-full-time-staff.html
That's a pretty staggering figure. One in four full time employees will shortly be earning more than £42,445 per year. And of course, a further large number of self employed/contractors will be as well, but are not included in these figures.
I have to say I was surprised, I had no idea that many people were earning that much money.
The number of people in full-time employment is approximately 21 million.
There are a further 8 million part timers, and 4 million self employed/contractors.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/8900873/1.4m-extra-people-to-pay-higher-rate-tax.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/8139883/Number-of-part-time-workers-hits-record-high-as-firms-reluctant-to-take-on-full-time-staff.html
That's a pretty staggering figure. One in four full time employees will shortly be earning more than £42,445 per year. And of course, a further large number of self employed/contractors will be as well, but are not included in these figures.
I have to say I was surprised, I had no idea that many people were earning that much money.
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”
0
Comments
-
I think its probably about right as
teachers
high grade nurse
retail; store managers earn that.
over next few years more and more people be dragged into higher rate tax bracket.
if they have kids they will lose their child benefit in 2013 as £42,000 is limit.
only slight good news is the lower rate tax think aim is to move up to £10,000 when I started working was £4500. so the higher earner might be equal or slightly worse off I guess.
plus thats gross figure.
net with rising living costs does not seem to go that far.pad by xmas2010 £14,636.65/£20,000::beer:
Pay off as much as I can 2011 £15008.02/£15,000:j
new grocery challenge £200/£250 feb
KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON:D,Onwards and upward2013:)0 -
0
-
Aberdeenangarse wrote: »
Not true. One in 4 live on 60% or less of the median household income.
AIUI that includes singles without kids for example and pensioners that own their property outright and have a low income but also a lower need for an income. I don't think it's reasonable to describe people like that as poor.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Grant Thornton, the accountancy firm, says that if wages increase at the rate predicted by government economists there will be a record 5.5 million higher rate taxpayers by 2015 earning more than £42,475 per year.
The number of people in full-time employment is approximately 21 million.
There are a further 8 million part timers, and 4 million self employed/contractors.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/tax/8900873/1.4m-extra-people-to-pay-higher-rate-tax.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/8139883/Number-of-part-time-workers-hits-record-high-as-firms-reluctant-to-take-on-full-time-staff.html
That's a pretty staggering figure. One in four full time employees will shortly be earning more than £42,445 per year. And of course, a further large number of self employed/contractors will be as well, but are not included in these figures.
I have to say I was surprised, I had no idea that many people were earning that much money.
i'm not sure that the self employed / contractors / pensioners / early retired with loads of investment income who don't work etc. are actually excluded from the 5.5 million estimate - the article doesn't make it clear either way. unless i've missed something startling obvious.
it also seems to be (although this is just an educated guess) at the very least an estimate based on taking the known number of higher rate taxpayers now or recently, which presumably would include everyone, not just salaried employees, as a starting point and extrapolating forwards.
also, there are plenty of people in part-time employment who earn more than £40k. half the people in my office seem to only work 4 days a week, and all of them without fail are definitely on more than £40k.
so it's might be more like 1 in 6 FTE and half of the contractors? and i expect that the vast majority of the 5.5 million are crammed into the south east.0 -
I wish I could be "dragged" into higher rate tax bands
0 -
Aberdeenangarse wrote: »
you forgot to put "poverty" in inverted commas. based on the criteria here you could have a look at monaco and find that a quarter of the people lived in "poverty" as well, because they only had one yacht.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »..
so it's might be more like 1 in 6 FTE and half of the contractors? and i expect that the vast majority of the 5.5 million are crammed into the south east.
What about the effects of movement of labour as big companies seek to cut costs.
It's well known that the BBC have moved a fair chunk of jobs to Manchester. Will we see salaries come down as staff retire and their replacements are cheaper to recruit ?
Also, the continued growth in using immigrant labour is likely to push salary levels down isn't it ?
You can live reasonably outside the South East on less than £42K.0 -
looks likt those rent rises aren't so devastating then.0
-
Couple of key points you appear to have missed Hamish.
This is based on historic figures. Even the bloke himself suggests an average wage increase of 2.5% may actually be more appropriate. So that suggests that their calculations are based on the average earner earning higher wage rises than 2.5% each year. Seems very optimistic today. But may fall in line with historical data.Even if wages grow at a more conservative 2.5 per cent, more than 700,000 people will become higher or additional rate taxpayers in the same period.
Basing it on 2.5%, which is still pretty generous in the current climate, it would see the number from your title halved.He said he used figures on wage growth from the Government's Office of Budgetary Responsibility, but believed that the more conservative 2.5 per cent figure might be more appropriate. Middle ranking policemen and teachers, as well as senior nurses, face becoming higher rate taxpayers under these conditions.
I'd love to know what figure they have actually assumed most workers are getting, as it's way over 2.5%, but they don't say.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Grant Thornton, the accountancy firm, says that if wages increase at the rate predicted by government economists there will be a record 5.5 million higher rate taxpayers by 2015 earning more than £42,475 per year.
I earn far more than that now even though my wages being frozen for a couple of years. Despite that I can't afford a property, that must be why house prices keep falling. They will fall till they are affordable again..
:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards