We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Help, no insurance!

1…6791112…15

Comments

  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    No wonder the OP's gone away, it's developed into a penis size contest:(:(:(
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    The_Turner wrote: »
    But you keep coming back.:p


    Turner what is your problem?

    Keep taking a pop at me and you will soon be an ex newbie
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    if it looks like a Troll, smells and walks like one...
  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    buglawton wrote: »
    if it looks like a Troll, smells and walks like one...


    Put my foot in some troll sheite once, seconds anyone?
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
  • The_Turner
    The_Turner Posts: 505 Forumite
    cyclonebri1 wrote: »
    Turner what is your problem?

    Keep taking a pop at me and you will soon be an ex newbie

    :rotfl::rotfl:::rotfl:rotfl::rotfl:

    Calm down chap.
  • Trebor16
    Trebor16 Posts: 3,061 Forumite
    The_Turner wrote: »
    No they don't. It may be force policy for wooden tops. But nothing like that is stated in the rta.

    I never said it was but then you have demonstrated repeatedly that reading and comprehension are not your strong points.:D
    "You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"


    John539 2-12-14 Post 15030
  • The_Turner
    The_Turner Posts: 505 Forumite
    You said to seize a vehicle you need a supervisors permission, you don't.
  • Trebor16
    Trebor16 Posts: 3,061 Forumite
    The_Turner wrote: »
    You said to seize a vehicle you need a supervisors permission, you don't.


    Really? Says who?

    http://www.kent.police.uk/about_us/policies/p/p33.html
    "You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"


    John539 2-12-14 Post 15030
  • The_Turner
    The_Turner Posts: 505 Forumite
    Trebor16 wrote: »
    Really? Says who?

    http://www.kent.police.uk/about_us/policies/p/p33.html

    I think you’ll find the Secretary of State does. The power to seize a vehicle comes from Section 165 of the Road Traffic Act and not Kent Polices policy.

    Why do you insist on posting links that partially suit your point?

    If an officer in Kent seizes a vehicle without authority is the seizure lawful?

    Yes, however he may leave himself open to discipline issues for breaching force policy. You have to remember force policy is a guide for one force and not law.
  • Trebor16
    Trebor16 Posts: 3,061 Forumite
    The_Turner wrote: »
    I think you’ll find the Secretary of State does. The power to seize a vehicle comes from Section 165 of the Road Traffic Act and not Kent Polices policy.


    Indeed, and Kent Police have added their own policy to supplement this and laid down procedures. If you had read the document properly you woud have realised this.
    l
    The_Turner wrote:
    Why do you insist on posting links that partially suit your point?


    The link merely shows that police forces have written policies to ensure that seizures are carried out properly.

    The_Turner wrote:
    If an officer in Kent seizes a vehicle without authority is the seizure lawful?


    What a stupid question. You really don't know the answer to that?

    The_Turner wrote:
    Yes, however he may leave himself open to discipline issues for breaching force policy. You have to remember force policy is a guide for one force and not law.

    A policy designed to supplement the law and to ensure their officers do things properly. But you seem to have difficulty in taking that in.
    "You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"


    John539 2-12-14 Post 15030
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture