We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DEBT Recovery plus requireing proof of insurance and driving licence
Comments
-
Sorry, under the DPA I'm unable to give a third parties details to a mere parking company.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Section 36 of the Data Protection Act states that Personal data processed by an individual only for the purposes of that individual’s personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes) are exempt from the data protection principles and the provisions of Parts II and III."You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"
John539 2-12-14 Post 150300 -
Send them this on behalf of the Spanish driver!!
Ve y compra de peluche
0 -
PPC's & DCA's issuing HO/RT1's (producers), my goodness whatever next?0
-
-
Yes, but as they quote carp there's no reason why we should not do the same.:rotfl:You never know , if its the normal ppc drone they would probably believe it.Section 36 of the Data Protection Act states that Personal data processed by an individual only for the purposes of that individual’s personal, family or household affairs (including recreational purposes) are exempt from the data protection principles and the provisions of Parts II and III.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
Could this be another referral to Arkell v Pressdram by any chance?:D"You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"
John539 2-12-14 Post 150300
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards