PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

HELP! - Failed Survey - Single Skin Brick

Hi, I was wondering if anyone is able to help me with the results of a recent survey that has been completed as I am trying to buy a property.

The property has been rejected for the following reason :
'It is not possible to recommend the property as a suitable security for a mortgage because a significant part of the three storey structure is constructed of single skin brickwork'

The estate agents we have been dealing with are apparently dumbfounded by this and claim it shouldnt have been an issue, especially as it was built in 1826 and many buildings of this age have this particular issue. Needless to say this information has put serious question marks over the property for me, I have tried to speak to the surveyor directly, but a request needs to go through our mortgage lender, who will then contact them on our behalf, before coming back to us.

The estate agents claims that they sell a large number of properties built with this single skin brickwork, and have told us that they know a lender who will have no issue with lending to us on such a property. They are very keen to move us along, to the point of coming across as pushy, telling me that the vendors will even pay for our next survey, as well as the charge for using the estate agents. However my request that the problem be rectified has been rejected, so if we were to move forward with the property it would have to be under these terms.

I'm not sure how simple it would even be to resolve the issue, as the property itself is grade 2 listed.

Put simply, I would love to know if anyone can shed any light on this problem and offer any advice as to what to do. I am scared that I could end up buying a property that is unsafe, or could present further problems in the future, especially when it comes to selling the property myself. Any information on this would by greatly appreciated!
«1

Comments

  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    edited 7 November 2011 at 11:11AM
    The agents may sell them and there are lots of these houses around.

    But the problem is that some lenders are only prepared to lend on more recent forms of construction and materials, by which I mean late Victorian onward, and which are in state of repair that gives them security for a mortgage.

    They are looking for "average houses for average borrowers".

    You will have to speak further with the lender or find another lender. Your agent may recall earlier sales that x bought with a mortgage with Y but be careful that the lender is for you.

    Asking for the problem to be rectified is going to be rejected. You are frankly rebuilding the house* when the problem is that it clearly has a value, is saleable, as evidenced by other local sales, but not through some lenders.

    * Either a new brick skin externally or new internal walls with insulation vapour barriers etc, and re skinning the outside. None of which is likely to get past the grade 2 listing!
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Thanks for the information, so would that mean that the surveyor is being told to specifically look out for this as a reason to recommend to not lend? Because after the survey result the mortgage lender then held their own review before coming to a final decision.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    strikesy wrote: »
    Thanks for the information, so would that mean that the surveyor is being told to specifically look out for this as a reason to recommend to not lend? Because after the survey result the mortgage lender then held their own review before coming to a final decision.

    Not as such no. Each lender has a lending policy and guidance on a particular types of construction. The surveyor has a degree of discretion looking at the particular property as to security. They may be prepared to go into further detail as they know the building. Two issues might be structural integrity or just the fact that the u value ( how insulating it is, or rather isn't) would be of concern.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,213 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As the OP has cross posted on here and on the M&E board it would be a good idea to post in one thread only. OP?
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Hoof_Hearted
    Hoof_Hearted Posts: 2,362 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 7 November 2011 at 9:20PM
    strikesy wrote: »

    The estate agents we have been dealing with are apparently dumbfounded by this and claim it shouldnt have been an issue ...

    The estate agents claims that they sell a large number of properties built with this single skin brickwork....

    Lesson 1 -- estate agents will tell you anything to make the sale.

    You need to consider two things:

    1) The house will be expensive to heat with no cavity unless there is internal insulation.

    2) One day you will want to sell the house and it may be difficult as the same problem will arise.

    For clarification, by "single skin" do you mean the walls are one-brick thick or a solid wall two bricks thick (nine inches)? The latter is very common in older houses. The former is commonly used for garages, but not habitable rooms.
    Je suis sabot...
  • Slinky
    Slinky Posts: 10,924 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    For clarification, by "single skin" do you mean the walls are one-brick thick or a solid wall two bricks thick (six inches)? The latter is very common in older houses. The former is commonly used for garages, but not habitable rooms.

    Three storeys on a single skin, I'm surprised it's still standing! More likely to be solid with no cavity.
    Make £2025 in 2025
    Prolific £229.82, Octopoints £4.27, Topcashback £290.85, Tesco Clubcard challenges £60, Misc Sales £321, Airtime £10.
    Total £915.94/£2025 45.2%

    Make £2024 in 2024
    Prolific £907.37, Chase Intt £59.97, Chase roundup int £3.55, Chase CB £122.88, Roadkill £1.30, Octopus referral reward £50, Octopoints £70.46, Topcashback £112.03, Shopmium referral £3, Iceland bonus £4, Ipsos survey £20, Misc Sales £55.44
    Total £1410/£2024  70%

    Make £2023 in 2023  Total: £2606.33/£2023  128.8%



  • capeverde
    capeverde Posts: 651 Forumite
    Im not aware of many houses being built with single skin walls. Solid 9" yes with a running bond, but not a 3 storey building with 4" brickwork. Wouldnt happen as far as Im concerned. The only time I have come across it in the 80's a friend had an end terrace that was once a mid terrace, ie the properties to one side had been demolished. This left its gable wall as single skin and he couldnt sell it. Ended up underpinning it and building a wall on the external elevation. It wasnt a massive job but youre still not imo going to find a surveyor willing to recommend a mortgage on a property like this. Estate agent is talking out of his backside.
  • ognum
    ognum Posts: 4,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    We narrowly avoided buying a home with single brick (4inch) rear wall in the 80s I was sad that we had to walk away at the time but we found a better house and to my knowledge that house is still standing but it does seem difficult to sell!
  • Sounds to me like another mortgage valuer who is talking out of an entirely inappropriate orifice!
    Like the house I surveyed the other week where the valuer said that the bay window was solid brickwork and likely to be damp etc....except it was timber frame!
    Have you had a proper survey?
    I assume this is just the valuation that you're talking about.
    If it was a more complete survey then it's outrageous that you can't speak directly to the surveyor. You've paid for the survey and should be able to discuss it with him in detail!
    I would suggest that you need a full building/structural survey on a listed property of this type and age. That will tell you everything you need to know about the wall construction. And if the valuer was wrong (as I would think he is!) then you can go back to the lender and put them straight.
    As another poster has said, it is extremely unusual to find single 4" brickwork on a multi-storey property.
    Alan
  • teneighty
    teneighty Posts: 1,347 Forumite
    The term "single skin" here is causing confusion. Technically it means a solid wall with no cavity.

    A single skin wall in itself is not a structural problem for older properties, but it depends how thick it is and how it is tied together. At the risk of over simplifying things, for 3 storeys I would expect to see 13" on the ground floor reducing to 9" on the upper storeys although other configurations are possible.

    The surveyor/valuer needs to clarify why the single skin brickwork is a problem.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.