📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Exploitation and no lunch hour.

Options
17810121330

Comments

  • Martynb_
    Martynb_ Posts: 302 Forumite
    OP - you are rising to the bait.
    Too too many patronising/argumentative/unhelpful responses (more and more usual), although I admit that I haven't trawled the forum for more threads by you ;o)
    I am actually on your side, from a health and nutritional point of view - and also from the point of view of someone who thinks that there are more and more cases of employers taking advantage of trhe dreadful situation that this country is in - and the individual finds themseflf in a back-against-the-wall situation (such as this).
    I thoroughly agree with you re. Mars (other high-calorie, nutrionallly-poor snacks are available :D) and feel sure that some of the "suggestions" made here are deliberately unhelpful and contradictory.
    I would suggest that you make your breakfast as high-protein as you can (the old breakfast like a King rule) and find some way to take portable snacks with you (tuna and bean salad or something) - there must be some opportunity to have a short break and you could get that down you with some dried fruit or a yoghurt drink.... Have another non-sugary snack that you can have after work before heading to the gym, even a couple of hard-boiled eggs and a banana or rice cakes pre-spread with peabut butter - plan you refuellng for afterwards.
    Just thoughts.

    At last! Advice!! :D Thanks.:T
  • OP - you are rising to the bait.
    Too too many patronising/argumentative/unhelpful responses (more and more usual), although I admit that I haven't trawled the forum for more threads by you ;o)
    I am actually on your side, from a health and nutritional point of view - and also from the point of view of someone who thinks that there are more and more cases of employers taking advantage of trhe dreadful situation that this country is in - and the individual finds themseflf in a back-against-the-wall situation (such as this).
    I thoroughly agree with you re. Mars (other high-calorie, nutrionallly-poor snacks are available :D) and feel sure that some of the "suggestions" made here are deliberately unhelpful and contradictory.
    I would suggest that you make your breakfast as high-protein as you can (the old breakfast like a King rule) and find some way to take portable snacks with you (tuna and bean salad or something) - there must be some opportunity to have a short break and you could get that down you with some dried fruit or a yoghurt drink.... Have another non-sugary snack that you can have after work before heading to the gym, even a couple of hard-boiled eggs and a banana or rice cakes pre-spread with peabut butter - plan you refuellng for afterwards.
    Just thoughts.

    But OP stated they have to keep sugar levels high, that is why there are so many suggestions of high sugar content, relatively low nutrition foods. We are not being unhelpful at all, well we weren't originally, but OP keeps being contrary and changing the needs. Every time a potential solution is found another problem is found to counter it.
  • Martynb_
    Martynb_ Posts: 302 Forumite
    So you can have sugar, then why do you need to avoid at all costs? You can clearly eat it.

    How much sugar do you actually think is contained in a thin layer of tempura batter? I reckon less than a micro-gram.
  • Martynb_ wrote: »
    Potato has a low-glycemic index. ;)

    The tempura batter was paper-thin.


    Actually a jacket potato is medium GI.
  • GotToChange
    GotToChange Posts: 1,471 Forumite
    Whilst at least a protein shake contains all the nutrients you need.

    It may - if specifically formulated that way - contain a large proportion of nutrients - but not all fof them - and it takes more than one to achieve the RDA.
    Besides, it's almost one step away from astronuat food, don't you think?
  • Martynb_
    Martynb_ Posts: 302 Forumite
    Actually a jacket potato is medium GI.

    It's low on the glycemic scale is what I meant.
  • It may - if specifically formulated that way - contain a large proportion of nutrients - but not all fof them - and it takes more than one to achieve the RDA.
    Besides, it's almost one step away from astronuat food, don't you think?


    Sorry, it was sarcastic. Lowest form of wit I know but ner ner ner ner ner.
  • Martynb_
    Martynb_ Posts: 302 Forumite
    At least it got you lot talking! What else would you be doing? Working? :rotfl:
  • GotToChange
    GotToChange Posts: 1,471 Forumite
    edited 3 November 2011 at 4:54PM
    Blood sugar levels aren't stabilised by eating high sugar content foods though. And refined sugar is simply poison.

    Enough anyway. I'm withdrawing my involvement. (I said this because I do need to get to the Library rather than be posting on here for the rest of the afternoon, which could quite easily happen....)
  • Martynb_ wrote: »
    It's low on the glycemic scale is what I meant.


    No, you were wrong correctly the first time. GI (Glycemic index) shows relatively how easy a food is to digest. A potato is a medium food, as are most simple carbs. Processed foods such as breads are generally high GI and fruits, veg etc are generally low GI.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.