e petition asking for internet constrols on !!!!!! etc

scheming_gypsy · 12 November 2011 at 7:08PM

adouglasmhor wrote: »

How about liis windischmann http://www.liisweb.com/gallery.html

doesn't do it for me at all.

adouglasmhor · 12 November 2011 at 10:27PM

scheming_gypsy wrote: »

doesn't do it for me at all.

Fair enough, I don't expect everyone to have the same taste.

System · 12 November 2011 at 10:47PM

I think she's really nice looking, and she will age well too! Plumper girls tend not to get the lines and scrawny necks that thinner girls get as they age

msfoxymax · 13 November 2011 at 11:35PM

surfsister wrote: »

Will a moderator please delete this post as it breaks the etiquette code for the site and marks the poster out to be a troll who abuses other members.

or maybe we could set up a petition to get her banned. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

suki1964 · 13 November 2011 at 11:52PM

Purbeck wrote: »

I think she's really nice looking, and she will age well too! Plumper girls tend not to get the lines and scrawny necks that thinner girls get as they age

Thats me b*gger*d then, fat gut and a scrawny neck

Turkey anyone??

FarmersWife_2 · 14 November 2011 at 7:44AM

RubyRue wrote: »

There are already methods available not only in the internet browser itself but tools like Talk Talk HomeSafe that allow parents to control what their children view on the internet. The big four ISPs have already said they are putting tools in place to make it easier for parents to do this. Google itself at the moment is running a campaign with the CAB to raise awareness of internet safety. I don't view !!!!!! on the internet but I'm sure plenty of people do and last time I checked looking at !!!!!! wasn't illegal so why should people be blocked from viewing something perfectly legal because the tools already in place aren't being used.

Anyone with an ounce of tech savvy would be able to get past these controls easily, whether it is opt in or opt out and I imagine children now a days are.

I have this and it works... it stopped me looking at a home brewing site because it had references to alcohol :rotfl:

C x

RubyRue · 14 November 2011 at 9:26AM

FarmersWife wrote: »

I have this and it works... it stopped me looking at a home brewing site because it had references to alcohol :rotfl:

C x

:rotfl: I'm not surprised, they aren't that clever and just block sites by specific words rather than the content so perfectly legitimate sites are also blocked... Complete headache!

adouglasmhor · 14 November 2011 at 9:44AM

Anyone interested in naval navigation or the history of the Royal Navy can look forward to having SEXTANT blocked by many web filters.

msfoxymax · 15 November 2011 at 1:36AM

And words including...................

And many many more :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

scheming_gypsy · 15 November 2011 at 3:59PM

i think she might be a constrol freak.

e petition asking for internet constrols on !!!!!! etc

Comments

Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

🚀 Getting Started

Categories

Is this how you want to be seen?

Get our FREE Weekly email full of deals & guides - and it’s spam-free