We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BBC Thursday: The Future State of Welfare

1181920212224»

Comments

  • If all the families on low incomes that get help with their rent were forced to move away from London then rents and houses prices would collapse in London. There would be more supply in the many now empty properties and less demand if only the people left to pay out of their own pocket, and they will not want to pay so much.

    In my initial post on economies of scale for children I was relating purely to income benefits and not HB and I did suggest that the cuts be made only to non working claimants and that working claimants should receive the full amount.

    I believe that should apply HB too.

    The widening of the gap between 'is it worth my while to work' should be greater, and by paying less for those who breed children as a 'career move' on the state or taking away the option for family men choosing not to take a low paid because 'it is not worth it' would slowly disappear.

    It is not about being unfair, if anything it about being fair. Being fair to all the families/people that do work, often for not a lot more than those that don't/choose not to.

    If non working people/families still choose not to work they either have to pay the extra rent out of their (smaller) benefits or move...??

    How many single working adults are there that earn slightly too much to get any benefits and have to make choices like that..... I would think rather a lot
    Dont wait for your boat to come in 'Swim out and meet the bloody thing' ;)
  • No doubt this will be contentious?

    Is it the start of 'workfare' such as in the States?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2059237/Jobseekers-fail-work-forced-voluntary-work-30-hours-week.html
    Dont wait for your boat to come in 'Swim out and meet the bloody thing' ;)
  • John_Pierpoint
    John_Pierpoint Posts: 8,401 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 11 November 2011 at 9:22AM
    If one has tried to get a job for 2 years and failed, I think the market is trying to tell you something.
    "This is a global market and you already have a "pension" of at least 60 - 70 quid a week - it is time to go and do something useful with your life."

    Unfortunately there are a lot of people, especially after two years of "failure", that have a mental screw loose somewhere and extracting even 60 quid of value out of them per week is almost impossible.

    Sometimes the "born again" cults manage to get them actively employed again.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.