"terminate and test 5 No electric sockets" ???

DVardysShadow

1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »

Its not an argument it is the regs.

Now you can argue as much as you like but it doesn't change the fact you are WRONG.

So much for explaining a position.

Explanation 1. You know Jack

Explanation 2: You are dangerous

Explanation 3: You are wrong

Explanation 4: More poor advice & total lack of understanding of the rules surrounding the bad advice given by yourself.


Anything except a genuine explanation.

Now, on this matter, you might actually be right. But apart from hysterically telling me how wrong I am, we are well short of an explanation from you.

No enlightenment for anyone from 1984RFR on anything except how right he is and how wrong other people are.

zax47

1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »

Its not an argument it is the regs.

Now you can argue as much as you like but it doesn't change the fact you are WRONG.

Chill out fella, he's merely expressing his OPINION as to the vagueries and contradictions of the Wiring regs, and Part P.

Are you really a sparky? IMO your whole agressive attitude on here is hardly presenting our profession in a good light.

1984ReturnsForReal_2

DVardysShadow wrote: »

So much for explaining a position.

Explanation 1. You know Jack

Explanation 2: You are dangerous

Explanation 3: You are wrong

Explanation 4: More poor advice & total lack of understanding of the rules surrounding the bad advice given by yourself.


Anything except a genuine explanation.

Now, on this matter, you might actually be right. But apart from hysterically telling me how wrong I am, we are well short of an explanation from you. ept how right he is and how wrong other people are.

MrVardy


If you care to look back at my posts you will see quotes you later deleted which were rude from the offset. So if you expect me to play nice with you know you have another thing coming.

But as we all know you declared yourself an expert on the regs yesterday & do indeed have a copy to hand.

We also know this is not the first time you have started this behaviour with me. Don't we now. I expect more to follow at some stage in the future followed by another period of you spouting of rubbish.

1984ReturnsForReal_2

zax47 wrote: »

Chill out fella, he's merely expressing his OPINION as to the vagueries and contradictions of the Wiring regs, and Part P.

Are you really a sparky? IMO your whole agressive attitude on here is hardly presenting our profession in a good light.

Apologies MrVardy is an established _*^&!

Don't do much electrics. Although I am qualified in it including [FONT=&quot]2382-100, which I must say is a very easy exam if you possess the basic knowledge of electrics & can read quickly as you get to take the book into the exam.

Obviously MrVardy cannot read & doesn't have a basic knowledge.;)


[/FONT]

DVardysShadow

1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »

MrVardy


If you care to look back at my posts you will see quotes you later deleted which were rude from the offset. So if you expect me to play nice with you know you have another thing coming.

But as we all know you declared yourself an expert on the regs yesterday & do indeed have a copy to hand.

We also know this is not the first time you have started this behaviour with me. Don't we now. I expect more to follow at some stage in the future followed by another period of you spouting of rubbish.

So still no explanation. And, perfect though you are in your own little world, I have found your input on this thread to be offensive from the outset to me and to others. So play the insulted martyr and tell me how wrong I am. Anything apart from give an explanation.

DVardysShadow

zax47 wrote: »

Chill out fella, he's merely expressing his OPINION as to the vagueries and contradictions of the Wiring regs, and Part P.

Are you really a sparky? IMO your whole agressive attitude on here is hardly presenting our profession in a good light.

I have to agree. And zax, I appreciate the discussion with you. I rather wish 1984RFR would butt out. He is getting in the way of enlightenment.

DVardysShadow

1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »

Apologies MrVardy is an established _*^&!

Don't do much electrics. Although I am qualified in it including [FONT=&quot]2382-100, which I must say is a very easy exam if you possess the basic knowledge of electrics & can read quickly as you get to take the book into the exam.

Obviously MrVardy cannot read & doesn't have a basic knowledge.;)


[/FONT]

Preserved.

1984ReturnsForReal_2

DVardysShadow wrote: »

Preserved.

As is..........

DVardysShadow wrote: »

If we must communicate in thick speak.

page 3 I believe.

DVardysShadow

1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »

As is..........




page 3 I believe.

which is what you had just done to me prior on page 3 and to Leif too. I will admit I did not deal well with you, and I will apologise. And if you want to go away and think that you have been anything other than grossly offensive from that point on, I won't shatter your bubble.

1984ReturnsForReal_2

DVardysShadow wrote: »

Preserved.

DVardysShadow wrote: »

which is what you had just done to me prior on page 3 and to Leif too. I will admit I did not deal well with you, and I will apologise. And if you want to go away and think that you have been anything other than grossly offensive from that point on, I won't shatter your bubble.

Dream on. That was just the start of your rudeness on this thread. Most of the others you deleted. Most of which I quoted.

Its not the first time & you still throw your toys out when you get a bit back.

Unlike you though I don't delete my posts.

I will leave it at that whilst you carry on & try & convince the OP he has been conned & the sparky didnt have to do the work.

& by the way this "discussion" wouldn't have even got here if I hadn't of dragged the important info out of him.