We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

JSA contributions based query

My wife has just applied for contribution based JSA and has a small pension of £55 a week.

She was told that her JSA of £67.30 would be reduced by £24 due to her pension.

When she was on contribution based JSA a couple of years ago and had disclosed she was receiving the same pension, no reduction of of JSA was made. When she mentioned that no deductions were made last time she was told "she had been lucky".

I was under the impression that contribution based JSA was not means tested.

Do any of the experts out there now if I'm right and her pension should not be taken into account.

Thanks in advance for any advice given.
«1

Comments

  • NASA_2
    NASA_2 Posts: 5,571 Forumite
    Her pension should be taken into account penny for penny after a disregard of £50.

    Your wifes pension should reduce JSA by five pounds.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    It's not "means tested" but pensions and earned income (eg working less than 16 hours) can reduce it. Having a million in the bank won't...
  • Oldernotwiser
    Oldernotwiser Posts: 37,425 Forumite
    I'm pretty sure that this was something that changed a few years ago, which would explain the difference between your wife's earlier claim and the current situation.
  • NASA_2
    NASA_2 Posts: 5,571 Forumite
    I'm pretty sure that this was something that changed a few years ago, which would explain the difference between your wife's earlier claim and the current situation.
    This has been in place for ages. Some processors (And possibly some entire offices) seem oblivious to it which is probably why the first claim had nothing reduced and this one is being reduced.
  • epitome
    epitome Posts: 3,199 Forumite
    Is there any logical explanation which could be applied old rules, or new rules, which would explain how they arrived at a deduction of £24 however wrong they might be?
  • NASA_2
    NASA_2 Posts: 5,571 Forumite
    epitome wrote: »
    Is there any logical explanation which could be applied old rules, or new rules, which would explain how they arrived at a deduction of £24 however wrong they might be?
    None that I can see. Really strange figure to come to.
  • thor
    thor Posts: 5,515 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    epitome wrote: »
    Is there any logical explanation which could be applied old rules, or new rules, which would explain how they arrived at a deduction of £24 however wrong they might be?
    Is it possible that the op's wife was wrongly told that 'she was lucky' and that maybe they are clawing the money back that they should have taken in the first claim?
  • rogcal
    rogcal Posts: 214 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks for all the replies thus far and hopefully an answer will be given this week, when armed with the info you've supplied, the deduction is queried.
  • MrsManda
    MrsManda Posts: 4,457 Forumite
    If it helps, The Jobseeker's Regulations 1996 regulation 81 gives details about the £50 disregard of pensions when claiming JSA(CB). As far as I can tell this has not since been amended.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/207/regulation/81/made
  • rogcal
    rogcal Posts: 214 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thanks for that Mrs M. I've read it through and it doesn't indicate whether the amount of pension monies paid is based on the net or gross figure. I suspect it has got to be the net figure.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.