PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Next door's trees causing subsidence, can't sell, do I have rights?

Options
Didn't know where else to post this so apologies if its in the wrong place...

I was wondering if anyone please had any advice for me as I have a serious issue with my flat. Last year a large crack appeared on the outside of my property and caused my window frames to move and gaps to appear. I reported the issue to the building's management company and they sent out a surveyor who reported that it was caused by a subsidence problem. This has occured due to the trees in the garden of a large house that I live next door to. The trees are about five metres away from my wall and are very, very high.

The surveyors and management company have contacted the owners of the house numerous times to tell them to cut the trees and kill the roots as no work can start on fixing the cracks until this has been sorted. They haven't replied to any communication and everyone says they are unlikely to as there was a similar issue a few years ago when some other trees blocked all the light coming into other flats on the other side of my building. In that instance, the owners didnt respond to any calls to cut the trees and it ended up with the residents paying to get them cut themselves despite the trees being on the neighbours property.

I have just written a polite letter to the neighbours which I am going to post tomorrow outling the problem again and mentioning the effects it is having on me. Not only are there obvious things like draughts in my flat, damage that I need to repair but I am also trying to sell my home. I had someone interested about three weeks ago who said they would have definately bought it but the crack completely changed their mind and they have bought elsewhere. Estate agent says I'd either have to drop the price by a large sum or stay put for a number of years til its all sorted and the problem has definatelt cleared :(

In the letter I have said that I would really like things sorted amicably but would have to seek legal advice if nothing happened as its not only affecting me financially but seriously changing my options in life. The management company has said they would have to look into taking legal action too if the neighbour don't do anything but it would probably end up cheaper, easier and quicker if all the residents chipped in and paid to get the trees sorted ourselves.That obviously doesn't help with me selling my house or the unknown issues if I ever had to remortgage etc.

Does anyone know if I would have a legal case for action or even damages, especially if the management company are trying to sort it? Any advice is very welcome and I guess this is going to be a serious and long issue :(
«1

Comments

  • MrsCrafty
    MrsCrafty Posts: 2,114 Forumite
    Your household insurance will manage the legalities for you. I would contact them before you attempt any communication. This happened to me and the neighbour had to pay £1000 excess because it was classified as subsidence charges.

    They will contact your neighbour and if they don't respond will get get a court order to have the trees cut down. By this time the neighbour will be responsible for all of the fees. Your insurer may say that you can try to deal with it amicably but check first.
  • Biggles
    Biggles Posts: 8,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I have just written a polite letter to the neighbours which I am going to post tomorrow
    Er, they live next door, don't they? Have you actually spoken to them?
  • paddy's_mum
    paddy's_mum Posts: 3,977 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    I'm not quite sure where your management company are coming from with this since without either a court order or the consent of the owner of the trees, nobody has any right to go onto another's land and start chopping.

    Your household insurers is the best way to start, as Mrs Crafty has said.
  • dancingfairy
    dancingfairy Posts: 9,069 Forumite
    I've got a feeling that if the roots are on your land you have certain rights but I'd proceecd with caution and get legal advice via the insurance or via work if you have though sort of thing.
    df
    Making my money go further with MSE :j
    How much can I save in 2012 challenge
    75/1200 :eek:
  • Mallotum_X
    Mallotum_X Posts: 2,591 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Contact your insurance and let them deal with it.
  • I've got a feeling that if the roots are on your land you have certain rights but I'd proceecd with caution and get legal advice via the insurance or via work if you have though sort of thing.
    df

    Trouble is this OP is talking about a flat, so has the added complication of having to involve the management company and freeholder.

    OP should expect a battle. Sounds to me as if these flats are fairly new and I suspect the neighbour in question is not best pleased about the development.

    The criminal damage caused to their property (the trees) earlier on probably made them even less happy. The neighbour might well have done nothing because they didn't have to! Right to light only exists for people who've received natural daylight for 20 years or more and the law relating to high hedges is fairly specific.
    "One thing that is different, and has changed here, is the self-absorption, not just greed. Everybody is in a hurry now and there is a 'the rules don't apply to me' sort of thing." - Bill Bryson
  • gocat
    gocat Posts: 5,907 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee!
    MrsCrafty wrote: »
    Your household insurance will manage the legalities for you. I would contact them before you attempt any communication. This happened to me and the neighbour had to pay £1000 excess because it was classified as subsidence charges.

    They will contact your neighbour and if they don't respond will get get a court order to have the trees cut down. By this time the neighbour will be responsible for all of the fees. Your insurer may say that you can try to deal with it amicably but check first.

    This is interesting. I have had to contact my insurance company re subsidence and the likely cause of the subsidence is trees on council land over the fence from my back garden. But Ive been told that we have to pay the £1000 excess. Shouldnt it be the council?
    Also we have 4 conifer trees which the report says are not the cause for subsidence but have been advised to remove them in case they cause problems in the future and and have been told we will have to pay for that ourselves. Would have though the costs would have come out of the insurance for that?

    So looks like we have to pay the £1000 excess charge and pay for the conifers to be chopped down :eek:

    Anyone know if we have been told wrong?
  • MrsCrafty
    MrsCrafty Posts: 2,114 Forumite
    If the council own the trees, then they are causing damage to your property. Get back in contact with your household insurance and give them a hard time. I would also contact the council and see if you can speak to someone there.
  • chris_m
    chris_m Posts: 8,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    gocat wrote: »
    But Ive been told that we have to pay the £1000 excess. Shouldnt it be the council?

    This is usually the case with insurance excesses. The insurer will pay the costs, less the excess, and that's the end of it as far as they are concerned. If the insured party wants to recover the excess, they have to do it themselves.

    If you have legal cover as part of the policy it may be that they can help you recover the excess from the council but it would be a separate issue from the initial claim. Otherwise, you're on your own and would have to deal withhe council yourself or through solicitors/courts.
  • pimento
    pimento Posts: 6,243 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    gocat wrote: »
    Also we have 4 conifer trees which the report says are not the cause for subsidence but have been advised to remove them in case they cause problems in the future and and have been told we will have to pay for that ourselves. Would have though the costs would have come out of the insurance for that?


    If they're your trees, who do you think should pay for them to be felled?
    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." -- Red Adair
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.