We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
when cuts go too far
lemonjelly
Posts: 8,014 Forumite
It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
0
Comments
-
£5.2 million a year for about a days work?
Too far?
Not Again0 -
I would happily be paid £259,000 for voicing over a single episode.
Like footballers pay, this shows how disconnected many people are from reality. In terms of what people are worth.0 -
Im sure with current technology you could just recreate their voices pretty effectively anywayFaith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.0
-
I heard about this. $4,000,000 a year for voicing a show that was last funny in 2001 seems like a pretty good deal to me.0
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »I would happily be paid £259,000 for voicing over a single episode.
Like footballers pay, this shows how disconnected many people are from reality. In terms of what people are worth.
That nonsense has been spouted ever since footballs maximum wage was abolished.
No one holds a gun to my heard to buy Sky (I don't subscribe) or force me to go to the match.
The "talent" - Rooney, Matt Groening et al, get the rewards because their labour generates a torrent of $'sss and £'sss
No one goes to Old Trafford to watch Malcolm Glazer.US housing: it's not a bubble - Moneyweek Dec 12, 20050 -
Kennyboy66 wrote: »That nonsense has been spouted ever since footballs maximum wage was abolished.
No one holds a gun to my heard to buy Sky (I don't subscribe) or force me to go to the match.
The "talent" - Rooney, Matt Groening et al, get the rewards because their labour generates a torrent of $'sss and £'sss
No one goes to Old Trafford to watch Malcolm Glazer.
Fergie isn't immortal. Without the success on the field. The Glazers fragile property empire would collapse. Players hold the power now.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Fergie isn't immortal. Without the success on the field. The Glazers fragile property empire would collapse. Players hold the power now.
Players do hold the power, but successful or not, it will take well over £1.5 billion to buy United. The clubs debts are easily manageable.
They are a trophy asset, just like Newspapers were in the past.US housing: it's not a bubble - Moneyweek Dec 12, 20050 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Fergie isn't immortal. Without the success on the field. The Glazers fragile property empire would collapse. Players hold the power now.
Players do hold the power - hence they get the rewards, but successful or not, it will take well over £1.5 billion to buy United. The clubs debts are easily manageable.
They are a trophy asset, just like Newspapers were in the past.US housing: it's not a bubble - Moneyweek Dec 12, 20050 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »I would happily be paid £259,000 for voicing over a single episode.
Like footballers pay, this shows how disconnected many people are from reality. In terms of what people are worth.
Everyone is paid what they are worth.
A cleaner is paid what they are worth
Wayne Rooney is paid what he's worth
Dan Castellaneta is paid what he's worth0 -
Kennyboy66 wrote: »Players do hold the power - hence they get the rewards, but successful or not, it will take well over £1.5 billion to buy United. The clubs debts are easily manageable.
Buying the club is a different issue to the club funding itself to compete at the top level.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards