We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Waitress damaged my phone

Options
2

Comments

  • halibut2209
    halibut2209 Posts: 4,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I can't believe it took 15 posts before the right answer came out!
    One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.
  • Saver0811 wrote: »
    Post number two actually !

    The one that you edited at 10:02 this morning to include this information?

    Yes, that post.
    "If you no longer go for a gap, you are no longer a racing driver" - Ayrton Senna
  • Saver0811 wrote: »
    It was actually added at 8:10am after confirming with my legal advice !!

    10:02 edit was to amend spelling of post !

    Post 15

    screenshot20111003at104.jpg

    No your claiming that you mentioned this in your post which was post number 2. I read this thread very early this morning and it said nothing of the sort and you have now gone back and edited your post at 10:02AM today to try and make it look like you gave the correct information before shaun did.

    Dont worry - some of us moneysavers are wise to peoples tricks.. :T:T

    But i wont enter into a debate about it - you done it and its plain to see you have.
    "If you no longer go for a gap, you are no longer a racing driver" - Ayrton Senna
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Saver0811 wrote: »
    Post number two actually !
    The entire contents of post #2 as it first appeared are quoted accurately in post #3.
  • CapJ
    CapJ Posts: 264 Forumite
    Got completely off topic here, though I understand why. Chronology has been clarified so can we draw a line under it now? Back on topic:

    Public liability insurance - restaurant may not wish to claim to avoid increase in future etc.

    Next steps for OP.

    1. Try to get an admission in writing, even email of what actually happened.

    2. At the same time try to get the restaurant to pay you for the phone. Shoot for - new phone and they can have the old one and see what they offer (may have to accept less). Whether they claim it off their insurance, deduct some of it from waitress of pay themselves is not your problem - it's theirs.

    I would suggest trying to communicate via email. State what happened and ask for replacement phone. See how it goes from there.
  • Thanks guys. Still waiting for a phone call from the manager but fingers crossed....
  • BillTrac
    BillTrac Posts: 1,869 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    spencil wrote: »
    Thanks guys. Still waiting for a phone call from the manager but fingers crossed....

    Lets hope it's not your iphone they try calling you on..:rotfl:

    Seriously though, when I read your original post I thought it served you bloody right. Can't stand people who can't leave their bloody mobiles alone for a second.And really dislike the !!!!! who have to use their phones whilst eating. If I am eating a meal my phone stays in my pocket, any callers can wait until I am finished.

    But I see the phone was in your pocket. So I hope that the restaurant plays fair and puts you back in the position you were before ..ie a working iphone

    Good luck
  • Altarf
    Altarf Posts: 2,916 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The restaurant have almost certainly been negligent and will have to pay to compensate you.

    It depends on how the spill occured if the restaurant was negligent or not.

    If the restaurant was not negligent, then their insurance will probably not cover them, and therefore the OP is unlikely to get any money.
  • You don't have to be negilent to be liable.
    Take a car for example. You could be driving along totally legal at a suitable speed and you have an accident due to a blowout, a bird hitting your windscreen, a sudden pain in your chest etc.
    Even though you may not have been negligent in any way, you will still be held liable and it will be your insurance that pays put.

    The restaurant will have public liability insurance and not negligence insurance.
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    the restaurant might have insurance, but it will have an excess much higher than the value of a phone, I would imagine. Otherwise they would be claiming on it every other month.

    So the problem is getting the restaurateur to admit liability.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.