We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Nationwide Flex Account Worth Keeping?
Comments
-
C_Mababejive wrote: »NW are currently swapping out some of their credit cards for platinum ones..presumably for selected customers. The card offers unlimited cashback amongst other things..
True, but the Nationwide platinum credit card is still poor compared to the Halifax reward clarity credit card.0 -
bankersmug wrote: »The only thing I can think of is if there's some kind of sale or buyout in the future there might be a payout to members.
Any thoughts?
I think the likelihood of that is about the same as the sun rising in the West.
Where are all those ex-Building Societies who promised all those wondrous thing when they de-mutualised ?
Ah ! those great names, pillars of financial probity, solid as a Rock, ; The Halifax; Northern Rock: Bradford & Bingley: Alliance & Leicester, etc, etc, etc, and of course the good old Trustee Savings Bank - haven't they all done well ??
Every tax payer now owns large bits of them again - whether they wanted to or not..........:rotfl::rotfl:0 -
All building societies are vulnerable to bad decisions and adverse conditions, and takeovers still happen, like the upcoming demise of Norwich & Peterborough.moonrakerz wrote: »I think the likelihood of that is about the same as the sun rising in the West.
The doubt is whether anybody would get out while a shareholding was still worth anything.
But it's just about conceivable that a far-sighted Nationwide board would decide it was too small to compete effectively and look for a merger with say the Co-op."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0 -
Best to keep you'r flex account for the above reasons but it also costs the Nationwide to keep on sending you statements. As they have no shareholders to pay they are awash with money. One can only hope they will float one day and that may bring some accountability to those that run it.
Try taking the Nationwide test. If you can get a personnal loan or mortgage from them then you are gold plated and represent little or no risk or default. The reward for being low risk? there is'nt one. Now look around for a Nationwidw beating deal - its not hard to find, and you will get another leander taking more risk and offering better rates.
I swapped to Santander!!! With thier reputation as well, and surprisingly I have had no cause for complaint - and thats savings currentA/C and mortgage. Better still come to think of it - they don't try and sell me insurance every time I go in!0 -
All building societies are vulnerable to bad decisions and adverse conditions, and takeovers still happen, like the upcoming demise of Norwich & Peterborough.
Yes Building Societies are vulnerable to "bad decisions" - I think everyone now agrees that to de-mutualise was the worst one of all. (except for people like Adam Applegarth - who did very nicely out of it, thank you !!)
Building Societies are not allowed to borrow money on the open market to the same extent as the banks, so more of their assets are in bricks and mortar - not "dodgy" bonds from Greece/Italy/Spain/etc/etc.
Also, the Building Societies have this strange habit of NOT going bust and expecting the tax payer to bail them out. Building Societies have got into "difficulties" in the past but have always been taken over or merged with a larger society.
The Norwich & Peterborough is not undergoing a "demise" - it is merging with the Yorkshire Building Society - it is still a Mutual.
The last time a Building Society went "bust" was, IIRC, back in the 1800s
(I was Googling (unsuccessfully) to try and find a reference to this and came across a forum dated 2007 - where someone described Northern Rock as "prudent" :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:)The doubt is whether anybody would get out while a shareholding was still worth anything.
N & P is a mutual - there are no shares ................0 -
But instead of having delusions of how great they were going to be as independent banks, the more sensible societies simply sold themselves to a bank and distributed the windfall. See Bristol & West, Birmingham Midshires, C&G, Woolwich, National & Provincial, Leeds Permanent etc etc. There were lots of demutualisations, but only 5 of them became independent banks.moonrakerz wrote: »I think everyone now agrees that to de-mutualise was the worst one of all.
This is why they have liquidity crises.moonrakerz wrote: »Building Societies are not allowed to borrow money on the open market to the same extent as the banks, so more of their assets are in bricks and mortar - not "dodgy" bonds from Greece/Italy/Spain/etc/etc.
One or another gets into trouble relatively often.moonrakerz wrote: »Also, the Building Societies have this strange habit of NOT going bust and expecting the tax payer to bail them out.
Or somebody. Kent & Reliance by Flowers. Britannia by Co-operative Bank plc.moonrakerz wrote: »Building Societies have got into "difficulties" in the past but have always been taken over or merged with a larger society.
Give it a couple of years, there'll be nothing left except the name.moonrakerz wrote: »The Norwich & Peterborough is not undergoing a "demise"
There had better be, I'm a shareholder.moonrakerz wrote: »there are no shares"It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0 -
Well, I've closed the account as it has outlived its usefulness. Still have the Nationwide Mortgage though.0
-
I cannot think of many good reasons to not keep a nationwide account. I had a Santander and Lloyds Tsb accounts previously and I would rather stick pins in my eyes than ever have another account with either of those Banks.
Nationwide have a beautifully simple online transaction system with well laid out statements and easy to follow account payment/ transfer details .
I am confifent that you'll not find a better online account than nationwide .0 -
1) As a sacrificial account - something you can "transfer" to another bank in order to qualify for bonuses, eg Santanderbankersmug wrote: »Can anyone think of a good reason to keep a Nationwide Flex Account open?
Any thoughts?
2) It's free, which may be important to you at some point in the futureYou've never seen me, but I've been here all along - watching and learning...:cool:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards