The age issue

ppc_guy

I didn't say that and would prefer it if you didnt attempt to twist my words. i simply set out the scenario in the ideal world as seen by people on here to get discussion about the issue i was raising which was age.

I assumed that by ensuring the situation set out the perfectly issued ticket then it would not be atacked but it appears that within 1 hour i was wrong.

trisontana

ppc_guy wrote: »

I didn't say that and would prefer it if you didnt attempt to twist my words. i simply set out the scenario in the ideal world as seen by people on here to get discussion about the issue i was raising which was age.

I assumed that by ensuring the situation set out the perfectly issued ticket then it would not be atacked but it appears that within 1 hour i was wrong.

What do you mean by a "perfectly issued ticket", bearing in mind the true nature of contract law?

Coupon-mad

ppc_guy wrote: »

I didn't say that and would prefer it if you didnt attempt to twist my words. i simply set out the scenario in the ideal world as seen by people on here to get discussion about the issue i was raising which was age.

I assumed that by ensuring the situation set out the perfectly issued ticket then it would not be atacked but it appears that within 1 hour i was wrong.

Never mind the age issue, what about the disability issue?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8488737.stm

How on Earth have PPCs not realised they are breaking the law yet? Money-grabbing blinds people I suppose...

ppc_guy

Coupon nice of you to join in on another of my threads. Dont even start on the disability issue. My local Tesco express has 1 disabled bay out of 10 spaces. This disabled bay also forms part of the loading bay so when Tesco are having a delivery they are using the only disabled bay and must be in breach of TEA 2010? i have raised this with the store and area managed and had no joy

esmerobbo

As far as I am aware a minor can enter into a contract for a necessary, so they can sign a contract for say a house but not for a credit agreement. As car parking isn't a necessary even if a 17 year old actually signed a contract for you I don't think it could be enforced!

ppc_guy

That was my line of thinking too ... Nice to see you here too robbo

esmerobbo

ppc_guy wrote: »

That was my line of thinking too ... Nice to see you here too robbo

Nice to see you although we don't agree on your line of business at least you are prepared to debate!

I thought you were getting out of PPC'ing and going into Airport parking?

ppc_guy

2 deals fell through so far ...i am looking at some contract parking in the local city though.

esmerobbo

So you're still after a proper job? [tongue in cheek]

While your here any thoughts on the freedom bill?

HO87

@ppc_guy - it concerns me significantly that you seem to believe that the concept of "the perfect ticket", in the context of private parking companies, both exists and that it is capable of being summed up in a few sentences.

Forgive my cynicism but it seems more likely that someone from PPC Towers has just discovered that minors can only enter into contracts in certain circumstances and that such contracts may be voidable. They have now come up with the wizard wheeze of perhaps limiting access to 18 year-olds or above in the car parks they manage and maybe you're dipping you toe in the water?

Then one might suppose that it will be no red cars on Thursdays and - especially at Waitrose - no 4x4's at weekends. Where will the nonsense end?