We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Blu-Ray Is Dead

2

Comments

  • wolfman
    wolfman Posts: 3,225 Forumite
    Heh, a lot of !!!!!! knowledge is this thread :)

    Of course it was all heard via a friend...
    "Boonowa tweepi, ha, ha."
  • Does this mean that if you buy the new LG box of tricks that plays both formats you can cinvince your neighbours that you do not watch !!!!!! as you have a blue ray system, worth a try.

    gary
  • superscaper
    superscaper Posts: 13,369 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wolfman wrote:
    Heh, a lot of !!!!!! knowledge is this thread :)

    Of course it was all heard via a friend...

    Absolutely, noone here could possibly confirm all this with first hand (pun?) knowledge. ;)
    "She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
    Moss
  • movieman
    movieman Posts: 383 Forumite
    Betamax was superior to VHS too wasn't it?

    Not if you wanted to record a 90-minute movie off the TV while you were out; if I remember correctly, the original tapes were only an hour and longer ones didn't turn up for quite a while.

    There are many good reasons why Betamax failed, it's not the usual urban legend of 'better format, worse marketing'.
  • j_davies
    j_davies Posts: 697 Forumite
    movieman wrote:
    There are many good reasons why Betamax failed, it's not the usual urban legend of 'better format, worse marketing'.

    You sure about that?
  • movieman
    movieman Posts: 383 Forumite
    I don't see what you're trying to prove. That very page says a "multitude of technical drawbacks along with the proprietary nature of the Betamax format hurt it in its competition with VHS, in spite of the Betamax's superior video quality."

    And also points out the one-hour recording limit was a big disadvantage compared to VHS.
  • j_davies
    j_davies Posts: 697 Forumite
    movieman wrote:
    I don't see what you're trying to prove. That very page says a "multitude of technical drawbacks along with the proprietary nature of the Betamax format hurt it in its competition with VHS, in spite of the Betamax's superior video quality."

    And also points out the one-hour recording limit was a big disadvantage compared to VHS.


    Betamax VCR system
    Sony's proprietary recording technology produced a sharper picture than the competing VHS system, but initially could only record for 1 hour. Also, by not licencing the Betamax format, it was overwhelmed in the marketplace by the many competing, licensed VHS manufacturers. Although a failure in other markets, the Betamax format achieved some success in parts of Asia, and in the broadcast industry under the Betacam name.
  • movieman
    movieman Posts: 383 Forumite
    And?

    Maybe rather than posting links and quotes, you could try actually saying what you're trying to prove.
  • j_davies
    j_davies Posts: 697 Forumite
    movieman wrote:
    And?

    Maybe rather than posting links and quotes, you could try actually saying what you're trying to prove.

    Thought so you have no proof do you, At least I gave evidence as where you gave nothing but your own interpretation, facts are :cool:

    It may have been a technical nightmare and only 1hour (was going to be extended) but the geeks who had the task of rolling out Betamax took their eye off the ball and lost out by a superior marketing plan and a !!!!!! industry that sucked Sony dry (so to speak) ;)
  • movieman
    movieman Posts: 383 Forumite
    Thought so you have no proof do you

    Of what?

    Let me repeat what I said, and leave you to read your own Wikipedia page which supports exactly what I said: "There are many good reasons why Betamax failed, it's not the usual urban legend of 'better format, worse marketing'."

    Otherwise, since you don't seem to be able to explain what you're talking about, I don't see any point in continuing this thread.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.