We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can they really kick us out?
Comments
-
Jeffrey_Shaw wrote: »Ground 1 CANNOT give any right for L to obtain possession during the fixed term.
Thanks Jeffrey. That's what I thought.
So I think this means that, at least during his fixed term, OP needs only worry about a break clause.0 -
Yes, or any applicable Schedule 2 grounds.0
-
OK all you clever people, instead of talking about ground this and ground that and schedule 2 how about quoting what they are so us less knowledgeable people know what you are talking about?0
-
pmlindyloo wrote: »OK all you clever people, instead of talking about ground this and ground that and schedule 2 how about quoting what they are so us less knowledgeable people know what you are talking about?
Here it is: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/50/schedule/20 -
Jeffrey_Shaw wrote: »Not so. Any s.8 Notice (rent or otherwise) can lead to a Possession Order, even within the first six months.
But only grounds 1-8 are mandatory grounds, of course. The others (9-17, plus 14A) are discretionary.
Note the etc (ie grounds 1-17).
I did not (and still do not) see the value of detailing gounds 1-8 for the OP since his post gave no indication that they would be relevant. Enough to say that he is secure for 6 months unless he does naughty things! That is what he needs to know at this stage, not the intricacies of landlord and tenant legislation.
Come on! Let's stick to providing practical, relevant advice!0 -
-
Thank you everyone for all your help :-)
Interesting news - we don't have a copy of the rental agreement.
When we moved in, I signed three copies, and the letting agent said they needed to send them off for landlord to sign. They were going to post me a copy once it was signed. Thus far, no sign of it.
No idea what difference that makes.
For what it's worth, I'm fairly sure it did have a clause relating to the landlord wanting to move back in, so I think we'd best assume 2 months, but I'm not sure if not having a copy of the agreement makes any difference.
I'm also still assuming that it'd be 2 months from when notice is served - which it hasn't been thus far.0 -
You need to ask for one of the copies of the tenancy which you signed. The wording of the break clause, if any, is vital.0
-
Don't assume anything until you have a copy in hand. Go to your EA and demand a copy right now -0
-
Thank you all for your help. I thought you might like an update.
The contract did contain ground 1 notice, so we had at best two months (we might have been able to challenge it and stayed until the 6 month point, but that would only have been 3.5 months anyhow). We found another place nearby that looks nice (although it is a bit more expensive). We went back to the letting agent and said that we would be willing to forego the two months notice if they'd pay the costs of moving, and they have agreed.
So tomorrow my wife and I are moving into a new place, and this one doesn't have anything in the agreement that means they can kick us out early :-) It's a 1 year contract with a 6 month break clause, but the landlord has never lived there, and owns 4 properties close together. He bought them as a buy to let investment and as such is keen to have long term tenants (we spoke to one of the other tenants who has been there for 6 years, which is obviously a good sign).
Our original Letting Agents have been really good - they agreed to pay the costs of referencing and having contracts drawn up for the new place, as well as the cost of hiring a van (plus petrol) and moving my wife's piano. They've also kindly agreed to release the deposit early so that we can pay the deposit on the new place (after inspecting our current place, of course). If anyone is in the Croydon area and needs to move, I can't recommend Martin and Co enough :-)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards