breach of compromise agreement by employer.

azsxdc

So, is this employer who you worked for for almost 9 years (post #264) before leaving with a CA the same employer who made you redundant earlier this year after 16 years with a £22K payout? [see first thread started by Milkshock]

ILW

looks like it was all a pretty good bit of trolling then. Fun while it lasted though.

Uncertain

azsxdc wrote: »

So, is this employer who you worked for for almost 9 years (post #264) before leaving with a CA the same employer who made you redundant earlier this year after 16 years with a £22K payout? [see first thread started by Milkshock]

Well done, that is a nice piece of detective work for a "newbie".


Who were you before you became azsxdc?

azsxdc

Well done, that is a nice piece of detective work for a "newbie".


Who were you before you became azsxdc?

Thank you

Although I have read MSE forums for a while, I have not joined and posted until now, I couldn't resist posting today!

Milkshock

azsxdc wrote: »

So, is this employer who you worked for for almost 9 years (post #264) before leaving with a CA the same employer who made you redundant earlier this year after 16 years with a £22K payout? [see first thread started by Milkshock]

thats right my official reason for leaving was redundancy.

they paid me the redundancy package, twice.

i eventually returned the money that they overpaid which makes the whole situation now even more annoying to me, in that i operated above board so why couldnt they with regard to references?

and yes i did sign a CA with an agreed reference as well at the same time, so my story does add up

another point to add is what if i could prove that the email that was sent to new employer tipping them off actually came from a current employee of old company?

Milkshock

azsxdc wrote: »

Thank you

Although I have read MSE forums for a while, I have not joined and posted until now, I couldn't resist posting today!

great

and you got it all wrong anyway

go back to lurking would be my advice to you

azsxdc

So, did you work there for 9 years or was it 16?

mildred1978

azsxdc wrote: »

So, did you work there for 9 years or was it 16?

Given how quickly the OP seems to have sorted the 'issues' around the CA, perhaps he did 16 year's work in 9! :rotfl:

jem16

Milkshock wrote: »

thats right my official reason for leaving was redundancy.

they paid me the redundancy package, twice.

i eventually returned the money that they overpaid which makes the whole situation now even more annoying to me,

Only after you seriously tried to find a way of keeping it though.

in that i operated above board so why couldnt they with regard to references?

As far as I can see they did. However they were not prepared to lie when asked directly by the new employer.

and yes i did sign a CA with an agreed reference as well at the same time, so my story does add up

So which adds up - 9 years with the company or 16 years? You would surely know how long you have been there.

another point to add is what if i could prove that the email that was sent to new employer tipping them off actually came from a current employee of old company?

Don't see why that matters unless the person works for the HR department.

Milkshock

jem16 wrote: »

Only after you seriously tried to find a way of keeping it though.

but i didnt keep it therefore broke no contract.

As far as I can see they did. However they were not prepared to lie when asked directly by the new employer.

did they? what they did was confirm everything the 3rd party said, thereby verifying what could very well have been viewed as wild claims.

or at least i could have told them myself what the issues were, and put my side of the story accross (albeit positively from my point of view)

So which adds up - 9 years with the company or 16 years? You would surely know how long you have been there.

9 years


Don't see why that matters unless the person works for the HR department.

why does it make a difference which department they came from, since everyone in the organisation is bound by the CA.

As a matter of fact the person does work in HR. And?