Ford Focus or Fiesta ?

Sorry in advance for my rambling -

I cant seem to make up my mind- it is always like this every 4 to 5 years when i am thinking of changing my car- Wife is already fed up as i keep showing her different cars whilst driving on the road. " do you like this one "

So kind of narrowed my options down to Fiesta or Focus 1.6 auto

For now i do mostly motorway driving but that could change next year and i hate the sound of diesel engines ( seems like something is broken in the Engine) and dont really mind shelling out petrol - I also understand with diesel engines once something goes wrong the fuel savings becomes irrelevant as it is costly to fix.

Once again i apologise and would welcome your comments
I owe £3233 @ 0%
«1

Comments

  • Lum
    Lum Posts: 6,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Same as I said in the last thread, the Focus will be more comfortable on the motorway due to the larger wheelbase.

    I guess it comes down to how many miles you will be doing on a regular basis. If your commute is something silly like 4 miles motorway and 1 mile urban then it probably wont be such an issue. The quality of your local motorway may also make a difference.

    I'd suggest test driving both on the actual bit of road.
  • rodenal
    rodenal Posts: 831 Forumite
    Focus, no contest as I intimated previously too.

    Drive both, try and also drive a focus with a bigger engine and an auto or the 1.6 diesel (if they do an auto one). 1.6 will be horrid
  • UncleZen
    UncleZen Posts: 843 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I also understand with diesel engines once something goes wrong the fuel savings becomes irrelevant as it is costly to fix.

    Mmmmm, not sure thats true. less moving parts, no ignition system therefore less to go wrong

    OTOH if the turbo goes its goodbye £700 at least
  • Lum
    Lum Posts: 6,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    UncleZen wrote: »
    I also understand with diesel engines once something goes wrong the fuel savings becomes irrelevant as it is costly to fix.

    Mmmmm, not sure thats true. less moving parts, no ignition system therefore less to go wrong

    OTOH if the turbo goes its goodbye £700 at least

    Turbo, Particulate Filter, Dual Mass Flywheel.

    Admittedly the filter is less likely to be an issue if this is going to be a motorway car.

    OP says they aren't too bothered about fuel costs either.
  • blacksta
    blacksta Posts: 919 Forumite
    edited 11 August 2011 at 4:47PM
    UncleZen wrote: »
    I also understand with diesel engines once something goes wrong the fuel savings becomes irrelevant as it is costly to fix.

    Mmmmm, not sure thats true. less moving parts, no ignition system therefore less to go wrong

    OTOH if the turbo goes its goodbye £700 at least

    Magic Word - I would simply start crying OR Be forced into a starvation mode - if i had to spend that KIND of money to fix a car
    I owe £3233 @ 0%
  • Wayne3765
    Wayne3765 Posts: 631 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    rodenal wrote: »
    Focus, no contest as I intimated previously too.

    Drive both, try and also drive a focus with a bigger engine and an auto or the 1.6 diesel (if they do an auto one). 1.6 will be horrid

    What Car actually recommend the 1.6 as the best one to go for , there's 2 versions of the 1.6 petrol , commonly known as 100 bhp or 115 bhp.
    Confusingly, there were two 1.6-litre petrol models from launch, with either 99bhp or 113bhp. The latter is best, because the first is a little slow and noisy. However, Ford decided to drop the better option when the model was face-lifted in 2008.


    Test drive the 99bhp version, especially if you’re doing less than 12,000 miles a year, or look for the well-rounded 1.6 TDCI diesel model. It will cost more to buy, but gives much better fuel economy and has better resale values.

    Avoid the pointlessly expensive 2.0-litre petrol model and, to a lesser extent, the 1.8-litre version.
    I'm looking into buying a focus and have the figures for (manual gearbox ) petrol engines -

    1.6 ( 100 ) 42.4 mpg combined , 0-62 11.9 secs ,max speed 112 mph, Road Tax £165

    1.6 ( 115 ) 42.8 mpg . 0-62 10.8 secs , max 118 mph , Tax £165

    1.8 ( 125 ) 40.3 mpg , 0-62 10.3 secs , max 123 mph , tax £190

    2.0 ( 145 ) 39.8 mpg , 0-62 9.2 secs , max 128 mph , tax £190

    Automatics are different from above figures , e.g

    2.0 auto = 35.3 mpg , 0-62 10.7 secs , max 121 and tax £245
  • giraffe69
    giraffe69 Posts: 3,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I bought a Focus 1.6 last October and do some motorway miles and also some round town. I've been very satisfied. I decided against diesel becuase I don't do the overall miles to justify it. I considered a bigger engine but in the end have been satisfied with a. performance at speed and handling in town. Fiesta is a bit cramped if you have four in the car but cheaper than the Focus of course.
  • WobblyDog
    WobblyDog Posts: 512 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts
    I've never driven a Focus, but I've recently bought a 2011 Fiesta, with the 1.25 82PS manual petrol engine.

    Compared to my old 1998 Fiesta, it feels like a much larger car, both inside and out. The increase in internal width is particularly noticeable, and the boot is a bit bigger as well. There's lots of leg room in the front. Externally, it's almost as large as a Mk1 Focus, although considerably lighter.

    For me, the Fiesta feels quite large and smooth enough for long motorway journeys. If I was frequently carrying more than 1 passenger plus luggage, I might want a larger car.
  • worried_jim
    worried_jim Posts: 11,631 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If you are unsure about petrol/diesel get this weeks auto express- brilliant article about the often false economy of buying a diesel engine.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    its catch 22 most modern cars are more reliable on basic numbers but have more to go wrong and are more expensive to fix when they do.

    Some are fussy about things like oil changes.

    my 98 1.9d 306 has no turbo, no dpf, no dmf. not to bad on the motorway happy between 70-80 but sluggish. 45-50mpg did 105k on the cambelt does not care much about getting serviced.


    Why change every 4-5 years?

    If not worried about consumption why go small?

    Go bigger and keep longer might be a better solution
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.