We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tesco two tier pricing
Comments
-
Actaully the most interesting thing about the Telegraph piece is the last paragraph;
The difference in pricing comes just weeks after figures from the Office of National Statistics revealed the volume of food purchased by consumers last month fell 4pc on the same month a year earlier, the first such fall it has recorded.
Now that IS something worth talking about. It tells you a good deal about the kind of pressure that household budgets are under, when you see a 4% FALL in the volume of FOOD being bought. It's of far more significance.
Surely there are more than enough articles and threads all over the internet about the big bad conservatives that analysing and debating a 4% fall in shopping expenditure is quite tedious. You'll have to come up with some really extreme conclusions from that piece of inane data to get me interested. Go on, give it a try. Good luck.0 -
The difference in pricing comes just weeks after figures from the Office of National Statistics revealed the volume of food purchased by consumers last month fell 4pc on the same month a year earlier, the first such fall it has recorded.
Now that IS something worth talking about. It tells you a good deal about the kind of pressure that household budgets are under, when you see a 4% FALL in the volume of FOOD being bought. It's of far more significance.
Perhaps the 'love food, hate waste' campaign is working?Common sense?...There's nothing common about sense!0 -
scottishminnie wrote: »all "paid for" through the endless amounts of taxes and national insurance we pay to the government.
"WE" of course being the English and the Welsh...............0 -
They could just convert all their Scottish stores to 'Tesco Scotland format' - they would have a smaller fruit and vegetable section, enlarged alcohol dept, and a bigger bakery serving butteries, yum yums, millionaire shortbread and empire biscuits.A kind word lasts a minute, a skelped erse is sair for a day.0
-
Owain_Moneysaver wrote: »They could just convert all their Scottish stores to 'Tesco Scotland format' - they would have a smaller fruit and vegetable section, enlarged alcohol dept, and a bigger bakery serving butteries, yum yums, millionaire shortbread and empire biscuits.
Don't forget a deep fat mars bar fryer.There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.0 -
Don't forget a deep fat mars bar fryer.
Pre-deep fried, take em home and microwave 'em! Ditto the battered pizza!
The 'volume of food' thing, what a useless statistic! If it is by value/spend then maybe people are buying nice cheap veggies and fewer readymeals and getting healthier?0 -
Actaully the most interesting thing about the Telegraph piece is the last paragraph;
The difference in pricing comes just weeks after figures from the Office of National Statistics revealed the volume of food purchased by consumers last month fell 4pc on the same month a year earlier, the first such fall it has recorded.
Now that IS something worth talking about. It tells you a good deal about the kind of pressure that household budgets are under, when you see a 4% FALL in the volume of FOOD being bought. It's of far more significance.
Just shows how much food we were buying but didn't need"Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.0 -
moonrakerz wrote: »"WE" of course being the English and the Welsh...............
... and the inhabitants of Northern Ireland was well, of course.0 -
The 'volume of food' thing, what a useless statistic! If it is by value/spend then maybe people are buying nice cheap veggies and fewer readymeals and getting healthier?
No, volume is volume. Switching from an expensive product to a cheaper alternative does not effect volume.fluffnutter wrote: »Just shows how much food we were buying but didn't need
Very likely.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards