We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
YEDL- Dispute over damage to electrical cable
Ginger-Dumpling
Posts: 11 Forumite
in Energy
Has anybody had any success in disputing a claim made by YEDL for damage to a mains cable.
The reason is, is that in putting in a fence post I went through a mains cable. On discovering that i may have gone through a cable i called and reported the incident.
YEDL very kindly came out and made good the repair and then informed me that i was liable for the repair.
I am aggreived at being liable as the mains cable feeds the property to a neighbouring property and hasn't anything to do with me. What angers me more is there is no need for the cable to be in my garden and could have gone a different route.
Secondly albeit that the cable was at the correct level it did not have any protective marking and as i was digging close to a conifer believed it was the root to the tree.
Anybody any ideas
The reason is, is that in putting in a fence post I went through a mains cable. On discovering that i may have gone through a cable i called and reported the incident.
YEDL very kindly came out and made good the repair and then informed me that i was liable for the repair.
I am aggreived at being liable as the mains cable feeds the property to a neighbouring property and hasn't anything to do with me. What angers me more is there is no need for the cable to be in my garden and could have gone a different route.
Secondly albeit that the cable was at the correct level it did not have any protective marking and as i was digging close to a conifer believed it was the root to the tree.
Anybody any ideas
0
Comments
-
Ultimately, you will probably end up referring it to your insurer under public liability.
But you could try challenging YEDL to produce the wayleave for the cableHi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
DVardysShadow wrote: »Ultimately, you will probably end up referring it to your insurer under public liability.
But you could try challenging YEDL to produce the wayleave for the cable
I'm i right in thinking as the cable is on my property providing electricity to another property, not mine, there should be a wayleave in place? What does it mean if there is or if there isn't???0 -
Was this is for a boundary fence? If so its possible that the boundary has 'moved' slightly over the years so instead of the cable running up the boundary line its now one side or the other.Ginger-Dumpling wrote: »The reason is, is that in putting in a fence post I went through a mains cable. On discovering that i may have gone through a cable i called and reported the incident.IT Consultant in the utilities industry specialising in the retail electricity market.
4 Credit Card and 1 Loan PPI claims settled for £26k, 1 rejected (Opus).0 -
Ginger-Dumpling wrote: »Has anybody had any success in disputing a claim made by YEDL for damage to a mains cable.
The reason is, is that in putting in a fence post I went through a mains cable. On discovering that i may have gone through a cable i called and reported the incident.
YEDL very kindly came out and made good the repair and then informed me that i was liable for the repair.
I am aggreived at being liable as the mains cable feeds the property to a neighbouring property and hasn't anything to do with me. What angers me more is there is no need for the cable to be in my garden and could have gone a different route.
Secondly albeit that the cable was at the correct level it did not have any protective marking and as i was digging close to a conifer believed it was the root to the tree.
Anybody any ideas
What were you digging with? If you were using a mini digger, then its unlikely they will let you off. If you were using a spade or digging manually then you might have a chance.0 -
Bottom line,you damaged it,you have to pay. You may be able to offhand it to your insurers. When excavating anywhere,you should carry out a full plant location servuy using appropriate equipment. Obviously a diy/member of the public wouldnt have this equipment.Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0
-
C_Mababejive wrote: »Bottom line,you damaged it,you have to pay. You may be able to offhand it to your insurers. When excavating anywhere,you should carry out a full plant location servuy using appropriate equipment. Obviously a diy/member of the public wouldnt have this equipment.
Fantastic bit of advice, really really helpful. I'm not looking at the bottom line more near to the top.....0 -
utter rubbish mababejive.
ginger can you answer my question....or pm me and ill give what advice i can0 -
Thanks Derby, i was digging with a fence post spade near to the corner border of my property. The cable in question runs parallel to my bottom boundary about 2ft my side. I have put up a fence to the left of the bottom boundary and because of how the fence post worked out my second to last post ended up on top of the cable(unaware at the time).0
-
sent you a pm....0
-
Not really..i have experience of utilities and it is common practice both for utilities to charge eachother,to charge contractors/fencers/road layer or anyone else who excavates and damages and it is also common practice to directly bill householders where either they or someone working on their behalf,damages a utility.utter rubbish mababejive.
ginger can you answer my question....or pm me and ill give what advice i can
#
Here is a link to the type of equipment used by those in the business for survey work prior to exacavation.
http://www.radiodetection.com/menu_map_level_3.asp?sec_id=2690
Damaging utilities can be very expensive apart from the danger of injury/deathFeudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards