We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Non tax payers - still get a cash ISA?

2»

Comments

  • TCA
    TCA Posts: 1,632 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks Ciaran. The unpredictability of inflation may be an issue, although I spend the majority of my time (and money) outside of the UK, so am not really influenced by it much. But my cash is in sterling though, so how the inflation rate translates into FX rates, I'm not sure, which is why I'm tending to look at absolute rates (or estimates of) as opposed to any measure of spending power. It's a bit of a headspinner.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Inflation in the UK will tend to rise as the currency sinks. So you could look on ILSCs as a sort of indirect way of guarding against currency depreciation.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • MoneySaverLog
    MoneySaverLog Posts: 3,232 Forumite
    Who is to say inflation will remain high, yes some investment in ILSC will guard against this but if inflation falls and rates increase they may not be so attractive then.

    Only time will tell I guess.
  • dtsazza
    dtsazza Posts: 6,295 Forumite
    Who is to say inflation will remain high, yes some investment in ILSC will guard against this but if inflation falls and rates increase they may not be so attractive then.
    The attraction isn't so much the nominal rate that one might get, but the fact that it guarantees a small amount of growth in real terms.

    Generally speaking I wouldn't expect cash to outpace inflation in the long-run, and if I could take an "inflation + 0.5%" return for life I'd consider that an excellent deal (modulo a sensible, i.e. applicable to me, definition of inflation).

    It's true that you might get a better overall return with unlinked savings accounts. But with that potential for gain comes the potential for losses; and as we're thinking in the context of a five-year product, if you're happy to have some volatility and uncertainty in returns then why not invest defensively in equities for even greater expected returns?

    In my own opinion, preserving the purchasing power of money I hold as an emergency fund is more important than trying to get a better return at the risk of it declining in value. The ILSCs are incomparably superior in this regard to any other options.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.