PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Sell at a Loss or Rent out

My Son & his family currently stay in a flat and HAVE to move.
They would have to sell their flat at a loss so are considering renting and taking on another mortage to buy a house.
There is good demand (according to the agent) in the area for rentals and it would be done through an agent (with permission from the lender :D)
They would just about break even renting & a high chance this would be DSS tenant.
They then plan to move in with parents to enable them to save for deposit (which they could do easily in 6 to 12 months)

I am very worried they would be overstretching financially with the two mortages as my son is just starting a new buisiness. If the flat was vacant for any time they would struggle.

I have some savings (enough for deposit for the new property & fees) which I can give them.
I suggested they sell at a loss and use the time they are staying here to pay this off during the 6/12 months.
I would then give them the deposit.

I will not give them the money if there is a chance they end up in fanancial difficulty and both properties are reposesed.
They are moving up the property ladder so the way I see it what they loose they will more than gain at the other side in 6/12 months time.

What would you suggest they do ?

Comments

  • bordercars
    bordercars Posts: 1,353 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    not all lenders like / allow dss, even insurance can be an issue. if they do let and pay an agent that is a god chunk of the profit gone, are they not able to either, just pay for an introduction or let and manage themselves. some LA's will pay rent 12 months of the year but at a slightly lower rental

    another option could be when getting 2nd mortgage change flat to interest only, at current rates this will give them a little flexibility whilst waiting for the market to turn around.
    Div 1 Play Off Winners 2007
    CCC Play Off Winners 2010
  • Loopgames
    Loopgames Posts: 805 Forumite
    I would personally never sell at a loss. In such a situation I would rent it out..and I would research the rental market in that area to see whether it is indeed in demand. But I would definitely give renting it out a go - no point in selling it at a loss the way I see it.

    Of course the other fundamental is a +ve cash flow from the rental each month.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,456 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I suggested they sell at a loss and use the time they are staying here to pay this off during the 6/12 months.
    I would then give them the deposit.


    Are you saying they're in negative equity? In which case, they would struggle to get a buy-to-let mortgage (it would require at least 25% equity), so wouldn't be able to get another mortgage to buy another property.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • brit1234
    brit1234 Posts: 5,385 Forumite
    They would just about break even renting & a high chance this would be DSS tenant.

    Hi, at the end of the year come the housing benefit cuts for DSS tenants so there is a real danger you will get less rent. Then there is the insurance costs you would have to pay.

    If you were to rent out the flat with the continuing price falls it may making remortgaging near impossible and produce higher mortgage payments.

    Far better to sell now before prices fall further otherwise the rent strategy sounds very risky.

    Do your family members have any landlord experience?
    :exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.

    Save our Savers
  • Thanks for all the replies.

    They do not have any landlord experience.
    They are not in negative equity as the flat is valued slightly higher than their current outstanding loan. But to get a sale now they would have to drop the price.
    The LA has advised the need buildings insurace only as it wont be furnished....oh on top of the liability ins which I think they intend to get through the LA.

    Renting out just seems a nightmare.
  • Hi,

    I was in a similar position to your son myself. I tried to rent out my flat for a while but when prospective tennants came to view it, they were put off (understandably) by my horrible neighbour playing loud music :(

    So in the end I decided to take the hit and sell it at a loss. It sold in 2 months and I have to say, it felt like such a weight had been lifted from my shoulders when I made that decision. No worries about paying a large mortgage and worrying about any repairs needing done to rental property etc.

    We are now staying with my parents to save and make up what we lost. :o

    Good luck with whatever you decide to do.
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I would strongly suggest that if they choose to rent it without an agent that they do their homework big time first as they could get severely ripped off AND get no rent into the bargain..!

    Having said that,choose the wrong agent and they will rip you off anyway..!
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
  • I would strongly suggest that if they choose to rent it without an agent that they do their homework big time first as they could get severely ripped off AND get no rent into the bargain..!

    Having said that,choose the wrong agent and they will rip you off anyway..!

    Thanks MC they would be going thru agent as they know her personally .... but being an old synic that means nothing when it comes to money:D....I should prob just stop worrying and let them make their own mistakes:eek:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.