Orange, defective goods and SOGASA1982

Heretic_osjc

Omg this thread was painful to read.

If youd have come into my place of work with this rude and condescending behavior youd have been asked to leave the premesis

Im over joyed if any headphones I buy last me 3 months

NFH

Heretic_osjc wrote: »

If youd have come into my place of work with this rude and condescending behavior youd have been asked to leave the premesis

What has been said that is rude or condascending and by whom?

Heretic_osjc wrote: »

Im over joyed if any headphones I buy last me 3 months

Then you are a very easily pleased consumer and have very low expectations on product quality and durability.

Heretic_osjc

NFH wrote: »

What has been said that is rude or condascending and by whom?

Your attitude towards the whole thing :rotfl:

NFH wrote: »

Then you are a very easily pleased consumer and have very low expectations on product quality and durability.

No I just now how rough I treat my headphones

NFH

Heretic_osjc wrote: »

Your attitude towards the whole thing

Again, what specifically have I said or done that is rude or condascending? You weren't in the Orange shop, so you have no idea how polite I was to them. As a result of being polite, they found a way to replace the faulty hands-free. If you can't get your facts right, keep quiet.

Heretic_osjc

NFH wrote: »

If you can't get your facts right, keep quiet.

See that was very quite rude! :cool:

NFH

Heretic_osjc wrote: »

See that was very quite rude! :cool:

Indeed, and it was a deserved reciprocation of your own comments. By the way, learn to spell as well so we don't have to endure your illiterate drivel.

Guys_Dad

NFH wrote: »

Indeed, and it was a deserved reciprocation of your own comments. By the way, learn to spell as well so we don't have to endure your illiterate drivel.

That last bit was a little bit of a low blow. Maybe some spelling or typing errors, but no trace of illiteracy.

NFH

Guys_Dad wrote: »

That last bit was a little bit of a low blow. Maybe some spelling or typing errors, but no trace of illiteracy.

Possibly, but I'm getting fed up with personal attacks in this thread, just because people don't accept an expert consumer solicitor's interpretation of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. The other attacks have been removed by moderators. When Heretic_osjc said the thread was painful to read, it had to be pointed out that it is in fact his own posts that are painful to read with 7 spelling mistakes so far.

Kingsd316

Please close this thread as its been resolved!