We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MY CONSUMER RIGHTS to compensation ?

stevesmith1
stevesmith1 Posts: 3 Newbie
edited 20 June 2011 at 2:43PM in Consumer rights
I have recently purchased a wooden summer house from a large supermarket online site. After receiving it, I had it painted, preserved and installed as per the manufacturers instructions by a professional joinery company. Once it was completed the Joinery company advised me that there were serious faults in its manufacture leading to serious damage when it was installed. Poor quality components were also supplied which have led to other unacceptable faults. At this stage I contacted the supermarket via email, fully documenting all the issues and supporting this with photographs. They contacted the supplier and advised them to contact myself, which they did. After a long discussion they advised me that they would collect the summer house and deliver a new one. I advised the manufacturer that this will now leave me with a further bill of over £250 to have the new summer house painted and installed as per the original one ! Is it fair to expect them to cover the cost of this, as it is clear that these costs have been incurred as a result of their mistakes when manufacturing the summer house ?
«1

Comments

  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    Was the painting and preservation as per the manufacturer's 'instructions' or merely their 'recommendations'? That aside, the company won't feel liable for any costs incurred as a result of what they'll see as your decision to paint and preserve the summer house. Moreover, it was your choice to pay £250 for this. I assume you could have bought the stuff yourself and done it far cheaper.

    You can ask, they might be generous. But I doubt you can insist on it as your legal right.
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
  • pcombo
    pcombo Posts: 3,429 Forumite
    Might of been the joinery company who damaged and put the blame on to the supermarket.
  • Gothicfairy
    Gothicfairy Posts: 3,060 Forumite
    Did they say have it done by a professional company or was it more " we recommend that you treat the wood " ? Because if they just said it should be treated then it would be down to you how you go about that and if it were me I would more then likely have done it myself as I am sure a lot of others would.
    It is a shame that the faults where not clear before the company started the work as that would have saved problems, was it only when it was put together that those problems became clear ? What I mean is if I had put the thing together myself would I have noticed the faults ? or is the fault something that really a professional would see over the lay person?

    I would think (although a call to consumer direct would be in order anyway) that if the fault is clearly visable when the thing is built they will pay for a replacement but nothing more as it is down to you how you install it ( unless their instructions say differently ) but if the fault is major and only a professional can spot it they might give in more as they would not want to go down the route of written letters in court from professionals etc....Although I could be totally wrong and they might not care either way.
    There is a race of men that don't fit in; A race that can't stand still;
    So they break the hearts of kith and kin, and roam the world at will.

    Robert Service
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    pcombo wrote: »
    Might of been the joinery company who damaged and put the blame on to the supermarket.

    Somewhat irrelevant, seeing as the retailer and manufacturer have accepted liability.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why did the joinery company not advise you of the "serious faults", "serious damage", poor quality components" and "other unacceptable faults" as they were found?

    Surely it would've made much more sense to have mentioned them to the retailer before any painting/preserving was done?

    I do not thing you will get the seller/manufacturer to cover the cost of repainting/retreating.
  • fthl
    fthl Posts: 350 Forumite
    if the problems were not apparent until it was all built, treated and painted, then you can probably get your money back for this work. If the problems should have been noticed before all that work you'll get zip.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    wealdroam wrote: »
    Why did the joinery company not advise you of the "serious faults", "serious damage", poor quality components" and "other unacceptable faults" as they were found?

    Surely it would've made much more sense to have mentioned them to the retailer before any painting/preserving was done?

    I do not thing you will get the seller/manufacturer to cover the cost of repainting/retreating.

    It is always advisable to preserve before assembly.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    It is always advisable to preserve before assembly.

    That would have been funnier if you'd said 'erection' instead of 'assembly'. I love using rudey words in a legitimate context.
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    That would have been funnier if you'd said 'erection' instead of 'assembly'. I love using rudey words in a legitimate context.

    LOL :rotfl::rotfl:

    I did have to take time over writing that.

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • fluffnutter
    fluffnutter Posts: 23,179 Forumite
    Flyboy152 wrote: »
    LOL :rotfl::rotfl:

    I did have to take time over writing that.

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

    Indeed. A good erection shouldn't be rushed.
    "Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.