We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
An Idiot MP thinks ParkingEye can fine you! "UPDATED"

esmerobbo
Posts: 4,979 Forumite


This Idiot Tom Greatrex MP beleives ParkingSpy can issue fines.
http://www.tomgreatrex.org/parking-changes-promised
http://www.tomgreatrex.org/parking-changes-promised
0
Comments
-
So PE are the good guys and its everyone else thats wrong. If they just had a way of paying on exit then all would be solved. Free up to 2 hrs and then a fee for the rest, no one would object to this except PE.
Pity there's no "comments" section for the page.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0 -
MP's have to be unbias in situations like these, they cannot charge into the PE HQ and say take the cams down because no can enforce the fines so why bother, dont forget the tax man gets a cut of your fine too! and PE is a buisiness. even if he despises the company he cannot go in a demand they leave the premises they operate on, and cant do anything about how they obtain our details and hound us to pay the fine thats up to house of lords to determin whether or not they should be regulated and have a structural system in place.
he needed to seem he was acting on behalf of his contituants and he made face for them (a vote winner).
as it stands PE have no powers to enforce the fines, and obviously certain buisinesses around that car park was suffering buisiness loss due to they way they operated, personally if that were the case and i owned a buisiness i would take the company they operate on behalf of to court for the loss's due to their unhand methods not ask an MP to go speak with them.
PE must of had a right laugh when he left.0 -
I agree he has no power to do anything individually, but it is incorrect of him to refer to these charges as "fines" by calling them such how many people will pay without question. Or after the sham appeal is rejected.
Where was he when Patrick Troy was in parliament saying basically these charges are unenforceable. All he has done is gone back to his constituents saying ParkingEye have said they will be fairer. Do any of us believe that.
I have emailed him asking why he described their charges as fines. Lets see if I get a reply.0 -
This Idiot Tom Greatrex MP beleives ParkingSpy can issue fines.
http://www.tomgreatrex.org/parking-changes-promised
you could always contact him direct though to put your view across
[EMAIL="tom.greatrex.mp@parliament.uk"]tom.greatrex.mp@parliament.uk[/EMAIL]0 -
martinthebandit wrote: »you could always contact him direct though to put your view across
[EMAIL="tom.greatrex.mp@parliament.uk"]tom.greatrex.mp@parliament.uk[/EMAIL]
Tis done however I don't know if I will get an answer?
From his auto response!
Parliamentary protocol also dictates that a Member of Parliament can only deal with issues on behalf of their own constituents. I would therefore be grateful if you could ensure you include your name and full postal address, within the Rutherglen & Hamilton West constituency. If this was not included in your email, I would be grateful if you could re-send your email with this additional information included.0 -
"Many people have said to me that they do not object to their being a fee for parking for longer than two hours"
Moron can't even spell.One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0 -
halibut2209 wrote: »"Many people have said to me that they do not object to their being a fee for parking for longer than two hours"
Moron can't even spell.
mst ov uz rnt out to mrk spling mstks thgh r we! or clling nmes
read forum ettiquet, came back with a nice attitude and perhaps say sorry.0 -
Sorry. I should have called him an utter moronOne important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0
-
atrixblue.-MFR-. wrote: »mst ov uz rnt out to mrk spling mstks thgh r we! or clling nmes
read forum ettiquet, came back with a nice attitude and perhaps say sorry.
Most people will have noticed that the quote was not from a posting on this site, but from the MP's website. I think an MP really ought to ensure that his public facing site uses correct spelling and grammar. :cool:0 -
I wonder how much Parking Spy paid that MP to come out with those comments *ponders*
But off course, all MPs are clean and above board, they would never take brides or claim dodgy expenses0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards