📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bought car, not as described and found receipts for work are fake.

2456

Comments

  • Woody._2
    Woody._2 Posts: 472 Forumite
    Tilt wrote: »
    From your account, it certainly is not a civil case. I would say it is fraud or 'obtaing money or services by deception' which is contary to the [STRIKE]theft act 1968[/STRIKE] fraud act 2006.

    The seller has deliberately produced false documents to persuade you to purchase the vehicle which cannot be anything else but deception. Go to the police station with all the documents and ask them to investigate.


    Please, get upto date.:rotfl:
  • Tilt
    Tilt Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    edited 11 June 2011 at 5:08PM
    Woody. wrote: »
    Please, get upto date.:rotfl:

    I am up to date;

    The offence of obtaining property be deception is created by s15(1) of the Theft Act 1968 which provides:
    "A person who by any deception dishonestly obtains property belonging to another, with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it, shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years."
    The actus reus of this offence is complete if the defendant (1) by deception (2) obtains (3) property (4) belonging to another. The mens rea consists of the defendant acting (1) dishonestly (2) with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it, and (3) deliberately or recklessly making the deception.

    Taken from; http://www.lawteacher.net/criminal-law/lecture-notes/deception-lecture.php

    However, the fraud act could also be applied here. In any event, this is a criminal matter not a civil one.
    PLEASE NOTE
    My advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.
  • bigjl
    bigjl Posts: 6,457 Forumite
    I assume this is some jap performance car or similar?

    I would have thiught he has brojen some kind of law as being a private sellee means the goods have to be as described surely.

    I would advise a trip to Citezins Advice asap. And a chat with Trading Standards as already suggested.

    Hope you get a good result, also complain to eBay as he may do this a lot using different id's.
  • Strider590
    Strider590 Posts: 11,874 Forumite
    edited 11 June 2011 at 5:22PM
    Bought cash. The car was on Ebay and sold but the seller said the buyer couldn't get the money so offered it to me on a private sale.

    Shill bidding too then...... Maybe? have ebay check that out.

    How it works - The seller uses a second account to chase up the bidding price, then at the end if he wins, he offers the item to the next highest bidder.

    VERY common scam when bidding on popular items... It's partly why I only ever do last minute bids.
    “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
  • Woody._2
    Woody._2 Posts: 472 Forumite
    Tilt wrote: »
    I am up to date;

    The offence of obtaining property be deception is created by s15(1) of the Theft Act 1968 which provides:
    "A person who by any deception dishonestly obtains property belonging to another, with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it, shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years."
    The actus reus of this offence is complete if the defendant (1) by deception (2) obtains (3) property (4) belonging to another. The mens rea consists of the defendant acting (1) dishonestly (2) with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it, and (3) deliberately or recklessly making the deception.

    Taken from; http://www.lawteacher.net/criminal-law/lecture-notes/deception-lecture.php

    However, the fraud act could also be applied here. In any event, this is a criminal matter not a civil one.

    See CPS charging standards.

    The OP will however need to provide evidence the car was sold to him as modified. He would have to link the advert, car and receipts, else the seller could say it was a bog standard car he sold to the OP.
  • Woody._2
    Woody._2 Posts: 472 Forumite
    Strider590 wrote: »
    Shill bidding too then...... Maybe? have ebay check that out.

    How it works - The seller uses a second account to chase up the bidding price, then at the end if he wins, he offers the item to the next highest bidder.

    VERY common scam when bidding on popular items... It's partly why I only ever do last minute bids.

    This really maters not to the OP, he bought the car outside of ebay. They do warn you not to do that.
  • scheming_gypsy
    scheming_gypsy Posts: 18,410 Forumite
    bigjl wrote: »
    I assume this is some jap performance car or similar?

    I would have thiught he has brojen some kind of law as being a private sellee means the goods have to be as described surely.

    I would advise a trip to Citezins Advice asap. And a chat with Trading Standards as already suggested.

    Hope you get a good result, also complain to eBay as he may do this a lot using different id's.


    From the sound of it they haven't asked for their money back, just that the seller hasn't offered the money back. So a trip to Citizens Advice should come after asking for a refund and being told it isn't happening. Also, if it's a private sale i'm pretty sure that Trading Standard's won't entertain it as it has nothing to do with them.
  • Tilt
    Tilt Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    From the sound of it they haven't asked for their money back, just that the seller hasn't offered the money back. So a trip to Citizens Advice should come after asking for a refund and being told it isn't happening. Also, if it's a private sale i'm pretty sure that Trading Standard's won't entertain it as it has nothing to do with them.

    If the seller has deliberately miss-sold or falsely discribed the car, then it matters not that it is a private sale. SOGA would still apply.
    PLEASE NOTE
    My advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.
  • scheming_gypsy
    scheming_gypsy Posts: 18,410 Forumite
    Tilt wrote: »
    If the seller has deliberately miss-sold or falsely discribed the car, then it matters not that it is a private sale. SOGA would still apply.

    maybe but the 'trade' is the important part of trading standards. Trading Standards (as far as i'm aware) is when buying from a trader and not a private sale.
  • pitkin2020
    pitkin2020 Posts: 4,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would seriously consider what you want to happen before making any decisions on how to proceed, if your happy with most of the car are you happy to take a partial refund, if not do you just want your money back and give the car back. Once you have decided get in touch with the seller, not over the phone use recorded letter or even email as it leaves a paper trail should you need it.
    Everyones opinion is the most important.....no wonder nothing is ever agreed on.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.