We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

No Mirrors, Damaged Car, Or A Parking Fine For Being On The Curb...:(

2456

Comments

  • roddydogs
    roddydogs Posts: 7,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Why are people quoting London Footpath parking rules? The offence is obstructing the footpath, which can be anywhere.!
  • esmerobbo
    esmerobbo Posts: 4,979 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Is this a Police FPN or a council PCN? "unnecessary obstruction" is a police FPN init? If it is a FPN then the only appeal is Magistrates court.
  • d.ross_2
    d.ross_2 Posts: 593 Forumite
    paddedjohn wrote: »
    your friend just got lucky, its not up to the fire brigade to advise you to park on the pavement just like you wouldnt ring the council if you had a fire.
    the leaflet he received mentioned inconsiderate parking so he parks on the pavement? can you not see the irony here?

    It is up to the fire brigade to make sure that they can get down a road. It is also up to the council to take such matters into account. After all it is the council who have made the footpaths so wide that the road width is restricted, meaning that there isn't enough parking space for the residents if they can only park one side of the road.

    It is a case of using common sense.
  • d.ross_2
    d.ross_2 Posts: 593 Forumite
    edited 13 June 2011 at 12:53PM
    Did the fire-brigade actually say to park on the pavement though or did they jsut say that parking on both sides of the road made it too narrow for their vehicles? If they didn't actually recommend parking on the pavement which I doubt then you need to park elsewhere however difficult that may be.

    In this case the footpath is very wide, so he wasn't causing any obstruction to people using the footpath. There are actually new developments in the same town where the planners have failed to consider residents parking, and the problem it causes for access for large vehicles.
  • Torry_Quine
    Torry_Quine Posts: 18,887 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    d.ross wrote: »
    In this case the footpath is very wide, so he wasn't causing any obstruction to people using the footpath. There are actually new developments in the same town where the planners have failed to consider residents parking, and the problem it causes for access for large vehicles.

    No matter how wide the pavement parking on it is inconsiderate and can cause problems.
    Lost my soulmate so life is empty.

    I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
    Diana Gabaldon, Outlander
  • d.ross_2
    d.ross_2 Posts: 593 Forumite
    No matter how wide the pavement parking on it is inconsiderate and can cause problems.

    Not on a cul-de-sac it isn't. It's just the council being jobsworths.

    What sort of problems do you see it causing? Because they wouldn't compare to the problems if a fire engine couldn't get through.
  • Torry_Quine
    Torry_Quine Posts: 18,887 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    d.ross wrote: »
    Not on a cul-de-sac it isn't. It's just the council being jobsworths.

    What sort of problems do you see it causing? Because they wouldn't compare to the problems if a fire engine couldn't get through.

    It causes problems to people with wheelchairs or double buggies and blind people using a cane.

    They need to park somewhere where they don't go on the pavement or unduly narrow the road even if that isn't close to home and yes I've had to do that.
    Lost my soulmate so life is empty.

    I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
    Diana Gabaldon, Outlander
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Parking on footpaths also causes damage to the surface and possibly any services buried beneath.When the fire brigade say you are blocking the road they mean park elsewhere, around the corner or something.
    Owning a car does not give automatic entitlement to a parking space.
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,737 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    There is no reason not to park partly on the kerb, in places where it's allowed. In fact in some roads there are bays marked partially on the pavement.

    In my road this is not the case, but there are no parking restrictions (cos we rejected the Council's 'kind offer'!). And on our side we have to park partly on the kerb or emergency vehicles couldn't get through. It's the accepted way to park in these narrow streets, there is nowhere else at all to park - and traffic wardens pass by here every single day to and from their office, with no tickets issued of course.

    I don't understand though, how the OP got a 'Council fine' for 'obstruction' which I thought was the domain of the Police. If it's a Council PCN I would put a pic of the PCN on pepipoo forums and get advice on a possible appeal:

    http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showforum=30

    If it's a Police FPN then pay it.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • anewman
    anewman Posts: 9,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    roddydogs wrote: »
    Why are people quoting London Footpath parking rules? The offence is obstructing the footpath, which can be anywhere.!
    anewman wrote: »
    http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Highwaycode/DG_069860?CID=TAT&PLA=url_mon&CRE=highwaycode_parking
    244 You MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London, and should not do so elsewhere unless signs permit it. Parking on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or pushchairs.
    Coupon-mad wrote: »
    I don't understand though, how the OP got a 'Council fine' for 'obstruction' which I thought was the domain of the Police.
    As parking offences are decriminalised, I believe many Police forces are getting rid of their traffic wardens - and local Councils taking over. I figure under such an arrangement Police would only get involved in cases of obstruction at the request of a concerned citizen, e.g. blocked in on their driveway.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.