PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Shared Ownership Confusion over selling on open market

I own a shared ownership property - I own 70% and the housing organisation owns the other 30%. I wish to sell the property and have been told by the housing organisation that I can put it on the open market as they failed to find a buyer. What is confusing me is that they say I have two selling options -

1. Sell my share.

2. Sell 100% via 'staircasing and onward sale'. My understanding of what happens here is that the buyers money is used to temporarily purchase the rest of the shares in my name and then the property is transferred from me to the buyer on the same day.

My feeling is that the second option will attract more buyers however I have some worries about how this would work, this is where I am hoping someone can help! I can't seem to find out anything about this online or find anyone thats done this before! :(

Q1. Do I have to tell the buyers that I only own 70% and explain how it will work? if so then i think this would put people off.

Q2. Can anyone shed more light on how this sale actually works on the day of completion?

Comments

  • brit1234
    brit1234 Posts: 5,385 Forumite
    I have known that shared ownership is far harder to sell but looking at your situation it looks even more unlikely as you have 70%. I would say most purchasers would want a smaller percentage. Also 70% of a shared ownership property is the equivalent to 100% of a normal property so you are likely to have even less buyers.

    Can the HA buy some of the shares back making it more attractive to buy?
    :exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.

    Save our Savers
  • Richard_Webster
    Richard_Webster Posts: 7,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ned to check with your solicitor as to whether you can sell 100% back to back. Some SO leases have a provision which can impose penalties on a buyer if he buys within 3 months of you buying in the final share.

    The actual transaction is a matter of synchronisation with the HA's solicitors which your solicitor will organise. You do have to watch that the HA will want 30% of what it's valuer thinks the value is which might be more than 30% of what you sell for!

    If you can do a back to back transaction then you don't need to tell your buyers the details because it is all legal stuff your solicitors will sort out - obviously a 100% sale will be for normal market value and therefore easier to sell on the open market.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • Thanks for this. I agree with brit1234's comment about it being difficult to sell the 70% - for people who want shared ownership, the majority only want to purchase between 25-50% to start off with. This is the reason that the 100% sale method seems like a better option for us.

    I have checked and we can definately do the back to back transaction, the housing organisation have given me an instruction form that authorises me to do this and my solicitor has said they can support this type of sale. Thanks to Richard Webster for his last comment as my main concern was really whether I need to tell the buyers about the background, because my fear is it will just sound complicated and put people off!

    I am going to go ahead with the 100% sale and let you know how I find the whole process (will hopefully help other people who end up in the same situation).

    Thanks for your posts. :)
  • geoffky
    geoffky Posts: 6,835 Forumite
    good luck and remember normal sellers are struggling to sell so you may be on the market a while..
    It is nice to see the value of your house going up'' Why ?
    Unless you are planning to sell up and not live anywhere, I can;t see the advantage.
    If you are planning to upsize the new house will cost more.
    If you are planning to downsize your new house will cost more than it should
    If you are trying to buy your first house its almost impossible.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.